Range, Alabama
38,204 opinions mention this place
LaGrange is a city in Troup County, Georgia, United States. It is named after the country estate near Paris of the Marquis de La Fayette, who visited the area in 1825. The population was 25,998 at the 2000 census. It is the principal city of and is included in the LaGrange, Georgia Micropolitan Statistical Area, which is included in the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, Georgia-Alabama (part) Combined Statistical Area. LaGrange has been the county seat of Troup County since December 16, 1828 and is home to LaGrange College, the oldest private college in the state. Its proximity to West Point Lake, a few miles to the west, makes it a tourist destination for bass fishermen.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Landmark decisions involving Range
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 244
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)540 U.S. 93overruled
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 306
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)539 U.S. 558
- Ring v. Arizona (2002)536 U.S. 584
- Harris v. United States (2002)536 U.S. 545overruled
- Atkins v. Virginia (2002)536 U.S. 304
- United States v. Morrison (2000)529 U.S. 598
- Guy Mitchells v. Mary L Helms (2000)530 U.S. 793
- Saenz v. Roe (1999)526 U.S. 489
- Agostini v. Felton Chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York (1997)521 U.S. 203
- Reno v. ACLU (1997)521 U.S. 844
- Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)521 U.S. 702
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida (1996)517 U.S. 44
- Romer v. Evans (1996)517 U.S. 620
- United States v. Lopez (1995)514 U.S. 549
- United States v. Gaudin (1995)515 U.S. 506
- United States v. Dixon (1993)509 U.S. 688
- R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992)505 U.S. 377
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (1992)505 U.S. 1003
- Payne v. Tennessee (1991)501 U.S. 808
- Employment Division v. Smith (1990)494 U.S. 872
- Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC (1990)497 U.S. 547overruled
- Walton v. Arizona (1990)497 U.S. 639overruled
Find legal help in Range
Practice-area guides and local resources for Range, Alabama.
Other cities in Alabama
Ordered by number of opinions mentioning each city.
- Section · 167,964
- Grant · 113,841
- York · 90,882
- Jones · 51,450
- Columbia · 42,186
- Anderson · 40,158
- Jackson · 37,434
- Black · 31,682
- Normal · 28,679
- Douglas · 24,968
- Kansas · 18,795
- Enterprise · 18,004
- Campbell · 17,376
- Kennedy · 17,180
- Morris · 17,030
- Jack · 15,524
- Houston · 15,076
- Ward · 13,609
- Hamilton · 13,498
- Gordon · 12,587
- Valley · 12,526
- Chapman · 12,416
- Reform · 12,180
- Banks · 11,530
Opinions mentioning Range
- 778 F2D 556United States v. George
- 778 F2D 28North Texas Media, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
- 778 F2D 258Smith v. Office of Personnel Management
- 778 F2D 1352Levi Strauss & Co. v. Blue Bell, Inc.
- 778 F2D 1236United States v. Liefer
- 778 F2D 1111United States v. Nassau Marine Corp.
- 777 F2D 910Ballou v. Booker
- 777 F2D 902Sanderson v. Rice
- 777 F2D 621Wilson v. Kemp
- 777 F2D 485Cooling System & Flexibles v. Stuart Radiator, Inc.
- 777 F2D 454United States v. Rodriguez-Ramirez
- 777 F2D 272Kirkpatrick v. Blackburn
- 777 F2D 113Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.
- 777 F2D 1007Marler v. Blackburn
- 777 F2D 1Hirschey v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- 776 F2D 819Louie v. United States
- 776 F2D 793Tucker v. Heckler
- 776 F2D 46United States v. Falu
- 776 F2D 455United States v. Ricks
- 776 F2D 394Bryant v. Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center of New York City
- 776 F2D 320Datascope Corp. v. Smec, Inc.
- 776 F2D 276Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management
- 776 F2D 209Orlando v. Heckler
- 776 F2D 134Walberg v. Israel
- 776 F2D 1156U.S.A. ex rel. Forman v. McCall
- 776 F2D 107Rhode v. Denson
- 775 F2D 959Roby v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.
- 775 F2D 762Booker v. Jabe
- 775 F2D 670United States v. Jeter
- 775 F2D 549United States v. Schurr
- 775 F2D 514Government of Virgin Islands v. Lee
- 775 F2D 342National Black Media Coalition v. Federal Communications Commission
- 775 F2D 243Kele v. United States Parole Commission
- 775 F2D 1387United States v. Mayer