City
Mark, Illinois
28,164 opinions mention this place
Mark is a village in Putnam County, Illinois, United States. The population was 491 at the 2000 census. It is part of the Ottawa–Streator Micropolitan Statistical Area.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Landmark decisions involving Mark
- Roper v. Simmons (2005)543 U.S. 551
- Rasul v. Bush (2004)542 U.S. 466
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)539 U.S. 558
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)540 U.S. 93overruled
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 244
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 306
- Atkins v. Virginia (2002)536 U.S. 304
- Ring v. Arizona (2002)536 U.S. 584
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga. (2002)535 U.S. 613
- Harris v. United States (2002)536 U.S. 545overruled
- Bush v. Gore (2000)531 U.S. 98
- Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)521 U.S. 702
- United States v. Lopez (1995)514 U.S. 549
- Walton v. Arizona (1990)497 U.S. 639overruled
- Grady v. Corbin (1990)495 U.S. 508overruled
- Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC (1990)497 U.S. 547overruled
- Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990)494 U.S. 652overruled
- Stanford v. Kentucky (1989)492 U.S. 361overruled
- Texas v. Johnson (1989)491 U.S. 397
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. (1989)491 U.S. 1overruled
- Batson v. Kentucky (1986)476 U.S. 79
- Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984)464 U.S. 417
- INS v. Chadha (1983)462 U.S. 919
- Plyler v. Doe (1982)457 U.S. 202
Find legal help in Mark
Practice-area guides and local resources for Mark, Illinois.
Administrative LawAdoption LawAgriculture LawAlimony and Spousal Support LawAlternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust and Trade Regulation LawAppellate LawAsbestos and Mesothelioma LitigationAssault and Battery DefenseAsylum and Refugee LawAviation Accident LitigationBanking and Finance LawBicycle Accident LawBoating Accident LawBonds and Government Finance LawBrain and Spinal Cord Injury LawBurn Injury LawBus Accident LitigationBusiness and Corporate LitigationBusiness Bankruptcy LawBusiness OrganizationsCannabis LawCar Accident LitigationChild Custody LawChild Support LawCitizenship and Naturalization LawCivil Litigation DefenseCivil Rights LawClass Action LitigationCollections LawCommunications and Media LawConstitutional LawConstruction LitigationConsumer Fraud and Deceptive PracticesConsumer ProtectionContingency Fee RepresentationContract LawCriminal Appeals LawCriminal LawCruise Ship Injury LitigationData Privacy and Cybersecurity LawDefamation Libel and Slander LawDivorce LawDog Bite LawDomestic Violence LawDrug Crime DefenseDUI and DWI LawElder LawElection Campaign and Political LawEminent Domain LawEmployee Benefits and ERISA LawEmploymentEmployment-Based Immigration LawEmployment Discrimination LawEnergy and Natural Resources LawEntertainment and Sports LawEnvironmental LawEstate Planning and Probate LawExpungement and Record SealingFair Credit Reporting LawFalse Advertising LawFalse Claims Act LawFamily-Based Immigration LawFamily LawFederal Criminal DefenseForeclosure LawFranchise and Dealership LawGaming LawGovernment Contract LawGrandparents Rights LawGuardianship and Conservatorship LawHealth Care LawHelicopter Crash LawHomicide DefenseIdentity Theft LawImmigration LawInsurance Bad Faith LawInsurance Coverage LawIntellectual Property LawInternet LawJuvenile LawLabor LawLandlord and Tenant LawLand Use and Zoning LawLegal Malpractice LawLemon LawMaritime and Admiralty LawMass Tort LawMass Transit Accident LitigationMedical Malpractice LawMergers and Acquisitions LawMilitary LawMotorcycle Accident LawNative Peoples LawNon Profit LawNursing Home Abuse LitigationPaternity LawPedestrian Accident LawPersonal Bankruptcy LawPersonal InjuryPolice Misconduct LawPremises Liability LawPrenuptial and Marital AgreementsProbate Litigation LawProbation and Parole ViolationsProduct Liability LawRailroad Worker Injury LawReal EstateRemoval and Deportation DefenseRollover Accident LitigationSchool and Education LawSEC and IRS Whistleblower LawSecurities LawSex Crime DefenseSexual Abuse and Assault LawSexual Harassment LawSlip and Fall LawSocial Security Disability LawSpecial Needs Planning LawTax Debt and IRS Disputes LawTax LawTheft and Property Crime DefenseToxic Tort LawTrademark LawTrade Secret LawTraffic Ticket CasesTrain Accident LitigationTransportation LawTruck Accident LitigationUtilities LawVeterans Benefits LawViolent Crime DefenseVisas and Green Cards LawWage and Hour LawWeapons Charge DefenseWhite Collar Criminal DefenseWills and Trusts LawWorkers Compensation LawWrongful Death LawWrongful Termination Law
Other cities in Illinois
Ordered by number of opinions mentioning each city.
- Justice · 119,568
- Standard · 115,757
- Washington · 107,414
- Union · 55,869
- Michael · 53,922
- Ohio · 45,722
- Columbia · 42,184
- Davis · 41,466
- Chicago · 38,725
- Virginia · 37,848
- Lee · 32,752
- Liberty · 29,672
- Normal · 28,677
- Henry · 27,552
- Assumption · 26,877
- Bureau · 25,920
- Worth · 24,820
- Nelson · 24,164
- Russell · 22,743
- Industry · 21,908
- Marshall · 20,826
- Robinson · 19,302
- Kansas · 18,794
- Arthur · 18,693
Opinions mentioning Mark
- 292 F2D 298Prestige Group Ltd. v. Home Decorators, Inc.
- 292 F2D 294Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Jones Engineering Co.
- 292 F2D 296Home Decorators, Inc. v. Ekco Products Co.
- 291 F2D 954New Castle Products, Inc. v. American Door Co.
- 291 F2D 945Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Winter Seal Corp.
- 291 F2D 756Bristol-Myers Co. v. Pharmaco, Inc.
- 291 F2D 669Trent v. Commissioner
- 291 F2D 460Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Kennedy
- 291 F2D 381National Labor Relations Board v. Des Moines Electrotypers' Union No. 84
- 291 F2D 336Empire State Highway Transportation Association, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Board and United States of America, American Export Lines, Intervenors
- 291 F2D 223Turpin v. Sacks
- 290 F2D 938Russell & Pugh Lumber Co. v. United States
- 290 F2D 837United-Carr Fastener Corp. v. Nylok-Detroit Corp.
- 290 F2D 845Weiss Noodle Co. v. Golden Cracknel & Specialty Co.
- 290 F2D 798Hanovich v. Sacks
- 290 F2D 632Mark O. Hatfield, Governor of the State of Oregon v. Paul R. Bailleaux
- 290 F2D 604Nelson v. Sacks
- 290 F2D 595Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Crown 400 Corp.
- 290 F2D 550Hart v. Ohio Bureau of Probation & Parole
- 290 F2D 166United States v. Koenig
- 290 F2D 183Jellison v. Kroger Co.
- 289 F2D 952Eastern Industries, Inc. v. Waterous Co.
- 289 F2D 955Servo Corp. v. Servo-Tek Products Co.
- 289 F2D 735Schiavone Terminal, Inc., Third-Party v. Comm. Guiseppe Bozzo, Third-Party Comm. Guiseppe Bezzo v. Edward J. Nearen
- 289 F2D 675Jenkins Bros. v. Newman Hender & Co.
- 289 F2D 656De Walt, Inc. v. Magna Power Tool Corp.
- 289 F2D 569Creamette Co. v. Merlino
- 289 F2D 464Grossman v. United States Atomic Energy Commission
- 289 F2D 370Straley v. Universal Uranium & Milling Corp.
- 289 F2D 311George O. Baird, Jr. v. Mark v. Marlowe
- 289 F2D 171Callaway v. Garber
- 288 F2D 954Mastic Tile Corporation of America (The Ruberoid Co., Mastic Tile Division, Assignee, Substituted) v. Congoleum-Nairn, Inc.
- 288 F2D 947H. D. T. Company Factors, Inc. v. H. M. Sinclair, Jr., Trustee for the Ohio Partnership, the Sinclair Manufacturing Company
- 288 F2D 938Rank Cintel Ltd. v. Kay Lab
- 288 F2D 944King-Kup Candies, Inc., Applicant-Appellant v. King Candy Company, Opposer-Appellee
- 288 F2D 926Clark Equipment Co. v. Baker-Lull Corp.
- 288 F2D 924United States Plywood Corp. v. Koveron Korporation
- 288 F2D 837Southern Railway Co. v. Hutchings
- 288 F2D 665Ferguson v. Tabah
- 288 F2D 530Cato v. Alvis
- 288 F2D 5National Van Lines, Inc. v. Dean
- 288 F2D 427Ruth Dodson v. Bernon L. Dodson
- 288 F2D 419Puerto Rico v. Federal Maritime Board
- 288 F2D 310Axel C. Wickman and Wickman, Ltd. v. Vinco Corporation and Joseph J. Osplack
- 288 F2D 306Maas & Waldstein Company and Plextone Corporation of America v. American Paint Corporation
- 288 F2D 201Dann v. Studebaker-Packard Corp.
- 288 F2D 193Coventry Ware, Inc. v. Reliance Picture Frame Co.
- 287 F2D 926General Aniline & Film Corp. v. Hukill Chemical Corp.
- 287 F2D 750Carl L. Baldwin and Alexinia Baldwin v. J. W. Morgan
- 287 F2D 681Newark Milk & Cream Co. v. Benson