City
Mark, Illinois
28,164 opinions mention this place
Mark is a village in Putnam County, Illinois, United States. The population was 491 at the 2000 census. It is part of the Ottawa–Streator Micropolitan Statistical Area.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Landmark decisions involving Mark
- Roper v. Simmons (2005)543 U.S. 551
- Rasul v. Bush (2004)542 U.S. 466
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)539 U.S. 558
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)540 U.S. 93overruled
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 244
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 306
- Atkins v. Virginia (2002)536 U.S. 304
- Ring v. Arizona (2002)536 U.S. 584
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga. (2002)535 U.S. 613
- Harris v. United States (2002)536 U.S. 545overruled
- Bush v. Gore (2000)531 U.S. 98
- Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)521 U.S. 702
- United States v. Lopez (1995)514 U.S. 549
- Walton v. Arizona (1990)497 U.S. 639overruled
- Grady v. Corbin (1990)495 U.S. 508overruled
- Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC (1990)497 U.S. 547overruled
- Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990)494 U.S. 652overruled
- Stanford v. Kentucky (1989)492 U.S. 361overruled
- Texas v. Johnson (1989)491 U.S. 397
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. (1989)491 U.S. 1overruled
- Batson v. Kentucky (1986)476 U.S. 79
- Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984)464 U.S. 417
- INS v. Chadha (1983)462 U.S. 919
- Plyler v. Doe (1982)457 U.S. 202
Find legal help in Mark
Practice-area guides and local resources for Mark, Illinois.
Administrative LawAdoption LawAgriculture LawAlimony and Spousal Support LawAlternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust and Trade Regulation LawAppellate LawAsbestos and Mesothelioma LitigationAssault and Battery DefenseAsylum and Refugee LawAviation Accident LitigationBanking and Finance LawBicycle Accident LawBoating Accident LawBonds and Government Finance LawBrain and Spinal Cord Injury LawBurn Injury LawBus Accident LitigationBusiness and Corporate LitigationBusiness Bankruptcy LawBusiness OrganizationsCannabis LawCar Accident LitigationChild Custody LawChild Support LawCitizenship and Naturalization LawCivil Litigation DefenseCivil Rights LawClass Action LitigationCollections LawCommunications and Media LawConstitutional LawConstruction LitigationConsumer Fraud and Deceptive PracticesConsumer ProtectionContingency Fee RepresentationContract LawCriminal Appeals LawCriminal LawCruise Ship Injury LitigationData Privacy and Cybersecurity LawDefamation Libel and Slander LawDivorce LawDog Bite LawDomestic Violence LawDrug Crime DefenseDUI and DWI LawElder LawElection Campaign and Political LawEminent Domain LawEmployee Benefits and ERISA LawEmploymentEmployment-Based Immigration LawEmployment Discrimination LawEnergy and Natural Resources LawEntertainment and Sports LawEnvironmental LawEstate Planning and Probate LawExpungement and Record SealingFair Credit Reporting LawFalse Advertising LawFalse Claims Act LawFamily-Based Immigration LawFamily LawFederal Criminal DefenseForeclosure LawFranchise and Dealership LawGaming LawGovernment Contract LawGrandparents Rights LawGuardianship and Conservatorship LawHealth Care LawHelicopter Crash LawHomicide DefenseIdentity Theft LawImmigration LawInsurance Bad Faith LawInsurance Coverage LawIntellectual Property LawInternet LawJuvenile LawLabor LawLandlord and Tenant LawLand Use and Zoning LawLegal Malpractice LawLemon LawMaritime and Admiralty LawMass Tort LawMass Transit Accident LitigationMedical Malpractice LawMergers and Acquisitions LawMilitary LawMotorcycle Accident LawNative Peoples LawNon Profit LawNursing Home Abuse LitigationPaternity LawPedestrian Accident LawPersonal Bankruptcy LawPersonal InjuryPolice Misconduct LawPremises Liability LawPrenuptial and Marital AgreementsProbate Litigation LawProbation and Parole ViolationsProduct Liability LawRailroad Worker Injury LawReal EstateRemoval and Deportation DefenseRollover Accident LitigationSchool and Education LawSEC and IRS Whistleblower LawSecurities LawSex Crime DefenseSexual Abuse and Assault LawSexual Harassment LawSlip and Fall LawSocial Security Disability LawSpecial Needs Planning LawTax Debt and IRS Disputes LawTax LawTheft and Property Crime DefenseToxic Tort LawTrademark LawTrade Secret LawTraffic Ticket CasesTrain Accident LitigationTransportation LawTruck Accident LitigationUtilities LawVeterans Benefits LawViolent Crime DefenseVisas and Green Cards LawWage and Hour LawWeapons Charge DefenseWhite Collar Criminal DefenseWills and Trusts LawWorkers Compensation LawWrongful Death LawWrongful Termination Law
Other cities in Illinois
Ordered by number of opinions mentioning each city.
- Justice · 119,568
- Standard · 115,757
- Washington · 107,414
- Union · 55,869
- Michael · 53,922
- Ohio · 45,722
- Columbia · 42,184
- Davis · 41,466
- Chicago · 38,725
- Virginia · 37,848
- Lee · 32,752
- Liberty · 29,672
- Normal · 28,677
- Henry · 27,552
- Assumption · 26,877
- Bureau · 25,920
- Worth · 24,820
- Nelson · 24,164
- Russell · 22,743
- Industry · 21,908
- Marshall · 20,826
- Robinson · 19,302
- Kansas · 18,794
- Arthur · 18,693
Opinions mentioning Mark
- 5 F1D 793Flower v. Rayner
- 63 F1D 280Neally v. The Michigan
- 69 F1D 762Travelers' Insurance v. Henderson
- 50 F1D 100Ashton Valve Co. v. Coale Muffler & Safety-Valve Co.
- 67 F1D 329American Fibre Chamois Co. v. De Lee
- 49 F1D 26Meyer v. Cadwalader
- 78 F1D 285Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Selden
- 46 F1D 186Jessup & Moore Paper Co. v. Cooper
- 31 F1D 772Duff v. Duff
- 25 F1D 624Morgan, L. & T. S. S. Co. v. De Arrotegui
- 65 F1D 424Jaros Hygienic Underwear Co. v. Fleece Hygienic Underwear Co.
- 83 F1D 167United States v. Jonas
- 40 F1D 767English v. The S. O. Pierce
- 28 F1D 434Lorillard v. Pride
- 11 F1D 243United States v. Hewitt
- 15 F1D 312Barber v. Connecticut Mutual Life Ins.
- 91 F1D 694Edison Electric Light Co. v. E. G. Bernard Co.
- 37 F1D 359Lichtenstein v. Goldsmith
- 95 F1D 87National Bank of Oshkosh v. Hunger
- 20 F1D 912Turrill v. Illinois Cent. R.
- 50 F1D 881Graves v. Davenport
- 51 F1D 826American Tube & Iron Co. v. Kentucky Southern Oil & Gas Co.
- 16 F1D 560Munson v. City of New York
- 17 F1D 620Hostetter v. Fries
- 39 F1D 121Sweeney v. Thompson
- 83 F1D 33German Savings & Loan Soc. v. De Lashmutt
- 84 F1D 641Sprague Electric Railway & Motor Co. v. Union Ry. Co.
- 47 F1D 696United States v. Allen
- 16 F1D 436Gray v. Taper-Sleeve Pulley Works
- 52 F1D 830George v. Smith
- 49 F1D 462Dornan v. Keefer
- 55 F1D 297Russell v. Newark Machine Co.
- 32 F1D 652Laird v. City of De Soto
- 92 F1D 494Ann Arbor R. Co. v. Fox
- 76 F1D 804Edison Electric Light Co. v. Kaelber
- 50 F1D 295Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.
- 50 F1D 565Smith v. Harrison
- 16 F1D 816City of Hoboken v. Pennsylvania R.
- 65 F1D 870Playford v. Lockard
- 21 F1D 727Briggs v. Day
- 74 F1D 555Loewer Sole Rounder Co. v. Gibbon
- 71 F1D 302Columbia Wire Co. v. Freeman Wire Co.
- 38 F1D 328MacDonald v. McLean
- 70 F1D 711Binns v. Zucker & Levett Chemical Co.
- 70 F1D 585Northern Pac. R. v. Pauson
- 26 F1D 410Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. Clarke
- 22 F1D 44Goodyear Rubber Co. v. Day
- 75 F1D 520Coburn v. San Mateo County