City
Mark, Illinois
28,164 opinions mention this place
Mark is a village in Putnam County, Illinois, United States. The population was 491 at the 2000 census. It is part of the Ottawa–Streator Micropolitan Statistical Area.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Landmark decisions involving Mark
- Roper v. Simmons (2005)543 U.S. 551
- Rasul v. Bush (2004)542 U.S. 466
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)539 U.S. 558
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)540 U.S. 93overruled
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 244
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 306
- Atkins v. Virginia (2002)536 U.S. 304
- Ring v. Arizona (2002)536 U.S. 584
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga. (2002)535 U.S. 613
- Harris v. United States (2002)536 U.S. 545overruled
- Bush v. Gore (2000)531 U.S. 98
- Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)521 U.S. 702
- United States v. Lopez (1995)514 U.S. 549
- Walton v. Arizona (1990)497 U.S. 639overruled
- Grady v. Corbin (1990)495 U.S. 508overruled
- Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC (1990)497 U.S. 547overruled
- Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990)494 U.S. 652overruled
- Stanford v. Kentucky (1989)492 U.S. 361overruled
- Texas v. Johnson (1989)491 U.S. 397
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. (1989)491 U.S. 1overruled
- Batson v. Kentucky (1986)476 U.S. 79
- Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984)464 U.S. 417
- INS v. Chadha (1983)462 U.S. 919
- Plyler v. Doe (1982)457 U.S. 202
Find legal help in Mark
Practice-area guides and local resources for Mark, Illinois.
Administrative LawAdoption LawAgriculture LawAlimony and Spousal Support LawAlternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust and Trade Regulation LawAppellate LawAsbestos and Mesothelioma LitigationAssault and Battery DefenseAsylum and Refugee LawAviation Accident LitigationBanking and Finance LawBicycle Accident LawBoating Accident LawBonds and Government Finance LawBrain and Spinal Cord Injury LawBurn Injury LawBus Accident LitigationBusiness and Corporate LitigationBusiness Bankruptcy LawBusiness OrganizationsCannabis LawCar Accident LitigationChild Custody LawChild Support LawCitizenship and Naturalization LawCivil Litigation DefenseCivil Rights LawClass Action LitigationCollections LawCommunications and Media LawConstitutional LawConstruction LitigationConsumer Fraud and Deceptive PracticesConsumer ProtectionContingency Fee RepresentationContract LawCriminal Appeals LawCriminal LawCruise Ship Injury LitigationData Privacy and Cybersecurity LawDefamation Libel and Slander LawDivorce LawDog Bite LawDomestic Violence LawDrug Crime DefenseDUI and DWI LawElder LawElection Campaign and Political LawEminent Domain LawEmployee Benefits and ERISA LawEmploymentEmployment-Based Immigration LawEmployment Discrimination LawEnergy and Natural Resources LawEntertainment and Sports LawEnvironmental LawEstate Planning and Probate LawExpungement and Record SealingFair Credit Reporting LawFalse Advertising LawFalse Claims Act LawFamily-Based Immigration LawFamily LawFederal Criminal DefenseForeclosure LawFranchise and Dealership LawGaming LawGovernment Contract LawGrandparents Rights LawGuardianship and Conservatorship LawHealth Care LawHelicopter Crash LawHomicide DefenseIdentity Theft LawImmigration LawInsurance Bad Faith LawInsurance Coverage LawIntellectual Property LawInternet LawJuvenile LawLabor LawLandlord and Tenant LawLand Use and Zoning LawLegal Malpractice LawLemon LawMaritime and Admiralty LawMass Tort LawMass Transit Accident LitigationMedical Malpractice LawMergers and Acquisitions LawMilitary LawMotorcycle Accident LawNative Peoples LawNon Profit LawNursing Home Abuse LitigationPaternity LawPedestrian Accident LawPersonal Bankruptcy LawPersonal InjuryPolice Misconduct LawPremises Liability LawPrenuptial and Marital AgreementsProbate Litigation LawProbation and Parole ViolationsProduct Liability LawRailroad Worker Injury LawReal EstateRemoval and Deportation DefenseRollover Accident LitigationSchool and Education LawSEC and IRS Whistleblower LawSecurities LawSex Crime DefenseSexual Abuse and Assault LawSexual Harassment LawSlip and Fall LawSocial Security Disability LawSpecial Needs Planning LawTax Debt and IRS Disputes LawTax LawTheft and Property Crime DefenseToxic Tort LawTrademark LawTrade Secret LawTraffic Ticket CasesTrain Accident LitigationTransportation LawTruck Accident LitigationUtilities LawVeterans Benefits LawViolent Crime DefenseVisas and Green Cards LawWage and Hour LawWeapons Charge DefenseWhite Collar Criminal DefenseWills and Trusts LawWorkers Compensation LawWrongful Death LawWrongful Termination Law
Other cities in Illinois
Ordered by number of opinions mentioning each city.
- Justice · 119,568
- Standard · 115,757
- Washington · 107,414
- Union · 55,869
- Michael · 53,922
- Ohio · 45,722
- Columbia · 42,184
- Davis · 41,466
- Chicago · 38,725
- Virginia · 37,848
- Lee · 32,752
- Liberty · 29,672
- Normal · 28,677
- Henry · 27,552
- Assumption · 26,877
- Bureau · 25,920
- Worth · 24,820
- Nelson · 24,164
- Russell · 22,743
- Industry · 21,908
- Marshall · 20,826
- Robinson · 19,302
- Kansas · 18,794
- Arthur · 18,693
Opinions mentioning Mark
- 91 F1D 955Illinois ex rel. Hunt v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.
- 14 F1D 724In re Ho King
- 41 F1D 172Smith v. Davidson
- 17 F1D 454Slessinger v. Buckingham
- 68 F1D 794City of Carlsbad v. Kutnow
- 58 F1D 566Union Paper-Bag Mach. Co. v. Waterbury
- 68 F1D 539American Grocery Co. v. Sloan
- 41 F1D 208Singer Manuf'g Co. v. June Manuf'g Co.
- 67 F1D 869United States v. Certain Tract of Land in Cumberland Township
- 17 F1D 104McConville v. Howell
- 80 F1D 700Weaver v. Norway Tack Co.
- 15 F1D 177Burns v. Multnomah R. Co.
- 14 F1D 732Consolidated Safety-Valve Co. v. Kunkle
- 45 F1D 500The Shubert v. The Brown
- 48 F1D 749French v. The Excelsior
- 92 F1D 357Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Globe Refining Co.
- 62 F1D 249Summerfield v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co.
- 71 F1D 21Lumley v. Wabash Ry. Co.
- 78 F1D 472Garrett v. T. H. Garrett & Co.
- 18 F1D 816Horton Manuf'g Co. v. Horton Manuf'g Co.
- 52 F1D 170Mark v. Home Ins.
- 37 F1D 375Eaton v. Neumark
- 61 F1D 986Overman v. Warwick Cycle Manuf'g Co.
- 32 F1D 110Virden v. The Harriet S. Jackson
- 38 F1D 789Wilson v. Fine
- 79 F1D 756West Pub. Co. v. Lawyers' Co-Operative Pub. Co.
- 79 F1D 954Johnson v. Bauer
- 18 F1D 559The Warren
- 14 F1D 183Hall v. Devoe Manuf'g Co.
- 70 F1D 801Boston Safe-Deposit & Trust Co. v. Mackay
- 43 F1D 257Henderson v. Cabell
- 55 F1D 80Williams v. The Welhaven
- 58 F1D 140Jordan v. Hardin
- 17 F1D 419Duluth Lumber Co. v. St. Louis Boom & Improvement Co.
- 71 F1D 443Forsyth v. City of Hammond
- 35 F1D 152Hall v. Sims
- 64 F1D 496Liberty Steamboat Co. v. Turner
- 41 F1D 109Pinckney v. The Hungaria
- 32 F1D 404Ex parte Byers
- 23 F1D 421Means v. Montgomery
- 46 F1D 760Anderson v. Saint
- 58 F1D 585Krauss v. Jos. R. Peebles' Sons Co.
- 49 F1D 163Willis v. Aspotogan
- 85 F1D 45Niles v. Cedar Point Club
- 67 F1D 306Ex parte Kyle
- 66 F1D 755Guggenheim v. Kirchhofer
- 73 F1D 352Darragh v. The Dunbritton