City
Mark, Illinois
28,164 opinions mention this place
Mark is a village in Putnam County, Illinois, United States. The population was 491 at the 2000 census. It is part of the Ottawa–Streator Micropolitan Statistical Area.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Landmark decisions involving Mark
- Roper v. Simmons (2005)543 U.S. 551
- Rasul v. Bush (2004)542 U.S. 466
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)539 U.S. 558
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)540 U.S. 93overruled
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 244
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 306
- Atkins v. Virginia (2002)536 U.S. 304
- Ring v. Arizona (2002)536 U.S. 584
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga. (2002)535 U.S. 613
- Harris v. United States (2002)536 U.S. 545overruled
- Bush v. Gore (2000)531 U.S. 98
- Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)521 U.S. 702
- United States v. Lopez (1995)514 U.S. 549
- Walton v. Arizona (1990)497 U.S. 639overruled
- Grady v. Corbin (1990)495 U.S. 508overruled
- Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC (1990)497 U.S. 547overruled
- Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990)494 U.S. 652overruled
- Stanford v. Kentucky (1989)492 U.S. 361overruled
- Texas v. Johnson (1989)491 U.S. 397
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. (1989)491 U.S. 1overruled
- Batson v. Kentucky (1986)476 U.S. 79
- Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984)464 U.S. 417
- INS v. Chadha (1983)462 U.S. 919
- Plyler v. Doe (1982)457 U.S. 202
Find legal help in Mark
Practice-area guides and local resources for Mark, Illinois.
Administrative LawAdoption LawAgriculture LawAlimony and Spousal Support LawAlternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust and Trade Regulation LawAppellate LawAsbestos and Mesothelioma LitigationAssault and Battery DefenseAsylum and Refugee LawAviation Accident LitigationBanking and Finance LawBicycle Accident LawBoating Accident LawBonds and Government Finance LawBrain and Spinal Cord Injury LawBurn Injury LawBus Accident LitigationBusiness and Corporate LitigationBusiness Bankruptcy LawBusiness OrganizationsCannabis LawCar Accident LitigationChild Custody LawChild Support LawCitizenship and Naturalization LawCivil Litigation DefenseCivil Rights LawClass Action LitigationCollections LawCommunications and Media LawConstitutional LawConstruction LitigationConsumer Fraud and Deceptive PracticesConsumer ProtectionContingency Fee RepresentationContract LawCriminal Appeals LawCriminal LawCruise Ship Injury LitigationData Privacy and Cybersecurity LawDefamation Libel and Slander LawDivorce LawDog Bite LawDomestic Violence LawDrug Crime DefenseDUI and DWI LawElder LawElection Campaign and Political LawEminent Domain LawEmployee Benefits and ERISA LawEmploymentEmployment-Based Immigration LawEmployment Discrimination LawEnergy and Natural Resources LawEntertainment and Sports LawEnvironmental LawEstate Planning and Probate LawExpungement and Record SealingFair Credit Reporting LawFalse Advertising LawFalse Claims Act LawFamily-Based Immigration LawFamily LawFederal Criminal DefenseForeclosure LawFranchise and Dealership LawGaming LawGovernment Contract LawGrandparents Rights LawGuardianship and Conservatorship LawHealth Care LawHelicopter Crash LawHomicide DefenseIdentity Theft LawImmigration LawInsurance Bad Faith LawInsurance Coverage LawIntellectual Property LawInternet LawJuvenile LawLabor LawLandlord and Tenant LawLand Use and Zoning LawLegal Malpractice LawLemon LawMaritime and Admiralty LawMass Tort LawMass Transit Accident LitigationMedical Malpractice LawMergers and Acquisitions LawMilitary LawMotorcycle Accident LawNative Peoples LawNon Profit LawNursing Home Abuse LitigationPaternity LawPedestrian Accident LawPersonal Bankruptcy LawPersonal InjuryPolice Misconduct LawPremises Liability LawPrenuptial and Marital AgreementsProbate Litigation LawProbation and Parole ViolationsProduct Liability LawRailroad Worker Injury LawReal EstateRemoval and Deportation DefenseRollover Accident LitigationSchool and Education LawSEC and IRS Whistleblower LawSecurities LawSex Crime DefenseSexual Abuse and Assault LawSexual Harassment LawSlip and Fall LawSocial Security Disability LawSpecial Needs Planning LawTax Debt and IRS Disputes LawTax LawTheft and Property Crime DefenseToxic Tort LawTrademark LawTrade Secret LawTraffic Ticket CasesTrain Accident LitigationTransportation LawTruck Accident LitigationUtilities LawVeterans Benefits LawViolent Crime DefenseVisas and Green Cards LawWage and Hour LawWeapons Charge DefenseWhite Collar Criminal DefenseWills and Trusts LawWorkers Compensation LawWrongful Death LawWrongful Termination Law
Other cities in Illinois
Ordered by number of opinions mentioning each city.
- Justice · 119,568
- Standard · 115,757
- Washington · 107,414
- Union · 55,869
- Michael · 53,922
- Ohio · 45,722
- Columbia · 42,184
- Davis · 41,466
- Chicago · 38,725
- Virginia · 37,848
- Lee · 32,752
- Liberty · 29,672
- Normal · 28,677
- Henry · 27,552
- Assumption · 26,877
- Bureau · 25,920
- Worth · 24,820
- Nelson · 24,164
- Russell · 22,743
- Industry · 21,908
- Marshall · 20,826
- Robinson · 19,302
- Kansas · 18,794
- Arthur · 18,693
Opinions mentioning Mark
- 9 F3D 1544Patterson Jr v. T W Thornhill
- 9 F3D 1543Hart v. A
- 9 F3D 1543Johnson v. Laham
- 9 F3D 1541United States v. Atkinson (Mark J.)
- 9 F3D 1541Securities and Exchange Commission v. Groshans
- 9 F3D 1492United States v. Forney
- 9 F3D 1430North Star Alaska v. United States
- 9 F3D 1397Larson v. Neimi
- 9 F3D 1309Graff v. City of Chicago
- 9 F3D 118United States v. Cr-92-31-T Williams
- 9 F3D 117Schwarz v. Church of Scientology International Ca
- 9 F3D 117Graham v. Frank Gunter X
- 9 F3D 117Jenson v. CS & T Body & Paint of Salt Lake, Inc.
- 9 F3D 115United States v. Michael E. Parker
- 9 F3D 114Lodermeier v. City of Sioux Falls
- 9 F3D 1139United States v. Cardenas
- 9 F3D 113Gregory D. Resnover v. Linley E. Pearson, Attorney General, and Richard Clark
- 9 F3D 112Davis v. Peters
- 9 F3D 1116Mississippi Poultry Ass'n v. Madigan
- 9 F3D 111United States v. Brenda C. Workman, Lois Breeding, and Jack G. Gibson
- 9 F3D 110We Note, However, That This Particular Argument Was Rejected in United States v. 316 Units of Mun. Sec., 725 F.supp. 172 :
- 9 F3D 110United States v. H Curtsinger
- 9 F3D 110United States v. Settle
- 9 F3D 1078Norman v. Taylor
- 9 F3D 1007United States v. Smith
- 89 F3D 976Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
- 89 F3D 897Washington Legal Foundation v. United States Sentencing Commission
- 89 F3D 886United States v. Bruce
- 89 F3D 955Sports Authority, Inc. v. Prime Hospitality Corp.
- 89 F3D 849Barry v. Gunter
- 89 F3D 847UNITED STATES of America, , v. Jack Nicholis D'UVA, . UNITED STATES of America v. Mark Thomas TAGGATZ; Jack Nicholis D'Uva-
- 89 F3D 845Mark Aston McAdoo v. United States Parole Commission Wayne H. Seifert, Warden, Metropolitan Detention Center, Los Angeles
- 89 F3D 845Merchants Transportation of California Inc v. National Labor Relations Board
- 89 F3D 845Glavor v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
- 89 F3D 844In Re Mark Chryson. Mark Chryson v. United States
- 89 F3D 844Arrellano v. The City of Culver City E D 1-50
- 89 F3D 845Dugger v. Copeland
- 89 F3D 841Rust v. Clarke
- 89 F3D 840Blue Thunder v. Class
- 89 F3D 838Mark Herman v. United States
- 89 F3D 838Pettiford v. Tm Lesher
- 89 F3D 836United States v. Marion Earl Hupp
- 89 F3D 832Castle
- 89 F3D 831Welch v. Ward
- 89 F3D 830United States v. England
- 89 F3D 829Sawyer v. Johnson
- 89 F3D 828Hope v. Thompson
- 89 F3D 828Lloyd Lewis
- 89 F3D 828Hill v. Town of Smithfield, Va.