City
Mark, Illinois
28,164 opinions mention this place
Mark is a village in Putnam County, Illinois, United States. The population was 491 at the 2000 census. It is part of the Ottawa–Streator Micropolitan Statistical Area.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Landmark decisions involving Mark
- Roper v. Simmons (2005)543 U.S. 551
- Rasul v. Bush (2004)542 U.S. 466
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)539 U.S. 558
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)540 U.S. 93overruled
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 244
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 306
- Atkins v. Virginia (2002)536 U.S. 304
- Ring v. Arizona (2002)536 U.S. 584
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga. (2002)535 U.S. 613
- Harris v. United States (2002)536 U.S. 545overruled
- Bush v. Gore (2000)531 U.S. 98
- Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)521 U.S. 702
- United States v. Lopez (1995)514 U.S. 549
- Walton v. Arizona (1990)497 U.S. 639overruled
- Grady v. Corbin (1990)495 U.S. 508overruled
- Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC (1990)497 U.S. 547overruled
- Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990)494 U.S. 652overruled
- Stanford v. Kentucky (1989)492 U.S. 361overruled
- Texas v. Johnson (1989)491 U.S. 397
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. (1989)491 U.S. 1overruled
- Batson v. Kentucky (1986)476 U.S. 79
- Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984)464 U.S. 417
- INS v. Chadha (1983)462 U.S. 919
- Plyler v. Doe (1982)457 U.S. 202
Find legal help in Mark
Practice-area guides and local resources for Mark, Illinois.
Administrative LawAdoption LawAgriculture LawAlimony and Spousal Support LawAlternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust and Trade Regulation LawAppellate LawAsbestos and Mesothelioma LitigationAssault and Battery DefenseAsylum and Refugee LawAviation Accident LitigationBanking and Finance LawBicycle Accident LawBoating Accident LawBonds and Government Finance LawBrain and Spinal Cord Injury LawBurn Injury LawBus Accident LitigationBusiness and Corporate LitigationBusiness Bankruptcy LawBusiness OrganizationsCannabis LawCar Accident LitigationChild Custody LawChild Support LawCitizenship and Naturalization LawCivil Litigation DefenseCivil Rights LawClass Action LitigationCollections LawCommunications and Media LawConstitutional LawConstruction LitigationConsumer Fraud and Deceptive PracticesConsumer ProtectionContingency Fee RepresentationContract LawCriminal Appeals LawCriminal LawCruise Ship Injury LitigationData Privacy and Cybersecurity LawDefamation Libel and Slander LawDivorce LawDog Bite LawDomestic Violence LawDrug Crime DefenseDUI and DWI LawElder LawElection Campaign and Political LawEminent Domain LawEmployee Benefits and ERISA LawEmploymentEmployment-Based Immigration LawEmployment Discrimination LawEnergy and Natural Resources LawEntertainment and Sports LawEnvironmental LawEstate Planning and Probate LawExpungement and Record SealingFair Credit Reporting LawFalse Advertising LawFalse Claims Act LawFamily-Based Immigration LawFamily LawFederal Criminal DefenseForeclosure LawFranchise and Dealership LawGaming LawGovernment Contract LawGrandparents Rights LawGuardianship and Conservatorship LawHealth Care LawHelicopter Crash LawHomicide DefenseIdentity Theft LawImmigration LawInsurance Bad Faith LawInsurance Coverage LawIntellectual Property LawInternet LawJuvenile LawLabor LawLandlord and Tenant LawLand Use and Zoning LawLegal Malpractice LawLemon LawMaritime and Admiralty LawMass Tort LawMass Transit Accident LitigationMedical Malpractice LawMergers and Acquisitions LawMilitary LawMotorcycle Accident LawNative Peoples LawNon Profit LawNursing Home Abuse LitigationPaternity LawPedestrian Accident LawPersonal Bankruptcy LawPersonal InjuryPolice Misconduct LawPremises Liability LawPrenuptial and Marital AgreementsProbate Litigation LawProbation and Parole ViolationsProduct Liability LawRailroad Worker Injury LawReal EstateRemoval and Deportation DefenseRollover Accident LitigationSchool and Education LawSEC and IRS Whistleblower LawSecurities LawSex Crime DefenseSexual Abuse and Assault LawSexual Harassment LawSlip and Fall LawSocial Security Disability LawSpecial Needs Planning LawTax Debt and IRS Disputes LawTax LawTheft and Property Crime DefenseToxic Tort LawTrademark LawTrade Secret LawTraffic Ticket CasesTrain Accident LitigationTransportation LawTruck Accident LitigationUtilities LawVeterans Benefits LawViolent Crime DefenseVisas and Green Cards LawWage and Hour LawWeapons Charge DefenseWhite Collar Criminal DefenseWills and Trusts LawWorkers Compensation LawWrongful Death LawWrongful Termination Law
Other cities in Illinois
Ordered by number of opinions mentioning each city.
- Justice · 119,568
- Standard · 115,757
- Washington · 107,414
- Union · 55,869
- Michael · 53,922
- Ohio · 45,722
- Columbia · 42,184
- Davis · 41,466
- Chicago · 38,725
- Virginia · 37,848
- Lee · 32,752
- Liberty · 29,672
- Normal · 28,677
- Henry · 27,552
- Assumption · 26,877
- Bureau · 25,920
- Worth · 24,820
- Nelson · 24,164
- Russell · 22,743
- Industry · 21,908
- Marshall · 20,826
- Robinson · 19,302
- Kansas · 18,794
- Arthur · 18,693
Opinions mentioning Mark
- 112 F3D 313McKenzie v. City of White Hall
- 112 F3D 1225United States v. Waksberg
- 112 F3D 1207Burkhart v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
- 112 F3D 118United States v. Davis
- 112 F3D 1232Petitioning Creditors of Melon Produce, Inc. v. Braunstein
- 112 F3D 1040McMillan v. United States
- 111 F3D 993Fun-Damental Too, Ltd. v. Gemmy Industries Corp.
- 111 F3D 806United States v. Grigsby
- 111 F3D 666United States v. Miguel
- 111 F3D 515United States v. Green
- 111 F3D 365United States v. Brooks
- 111 F3D 184Cortés-Irizarry v. Corporación Insular de Seguros
- 111 F3D 1548International Caucus of Labor Committees v. City of Montgomery
- 111 F3D 146United States v. Oakar
- 111 F3D 1450United States v. Stoddard
- 111 F3D 138Cooper v. Revolution Records Inc
- 111 F3D 138McGraw v. County of Riverside
- 111 F3D 138Trent v. Valley Elec. Ass'n, Inc.
- 111 F3D 1332Palmquist v. Selvik
- 111 F3D 133Key Jr v. Drake
- 111 F3D 128Union Tp. Cab, Inc. v. Township of Union
- 111 F3D 1126Smith v. Angelone
- 111 F3D 1183Ayers v. Fordice
- 110 F3D 869United States v. Paul
- 110 F3D 72United States v. G Wilkinson
- 110 F3D 71United States v. Arturo Ortiz-Ayala
- 110 F3D 70Elizabeth Selandia v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
- 110 F3D 70United States v. Bourgeois
- 110 F3D 69Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ks Resources
- 110 F3D 69In Re Mark Industries, Inc., a California Corporation, Debtor, Richard A. Marshack, Chapter 11 Trustee v. C. Richard Moyer, and Rallie Rallis
- 110 F3D 68Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23934i
- 110 F3D 64Johnson v. Perry
- 110 F3D 64Patel v. Zartarian
- 110 F3D 61United States v. Ubaldo Vincente Ortiz
- 110 F3D 61United States v. Andre D. Travis
- 110 F3D 61United States v. Timothy Robinson
- 110 F3D 61United States v. Hasty
- 110 F3D 61United States v. Williams III
- 110 F3D 60Parker v. Proffitt
- 110 F3D 60Billy E. Robinson v. Overnite Transportation Company
- 110 F3D 50United States v. Williams