City
Mark, Illinois
28,164 opinions mention this place
Mark is a village in Putnam County, Illinois, United States. The population was 491 at the 2000 census. It is part of the Ottawa–Streator Micropolitan Statistical Area.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Landmark decisions involving Mark
- Roper v. Simmons (2005)543 U.S. 551
- Rasul v. Bush (2004)542 U.S. 466
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)539 U.S. 558
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)540 U.S. 93overruled
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 244
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 306
- Atkins v. Virginia (2002)536 U.S. 304
- Ring v. Arizona (2002)536 U.S. 584
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga. (2002)535 U.S. 613
- Harris v. United States (2002)536 U.S. 545overruled
- Bush v. Gore (2000)531 U.S. 98
- Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)521 U.S. 702
- United States v. Lopez (1995)514 U.S. 549
- Walton v. Arizona (1990)497 U.S. 639overruled
- Grady v. Corbin (1990)495 U.S. 508overruled
- Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC (1990)497 U.S. 547overruled
- Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990)494 U.S. 652overruled
- Stanford v. Kentucky (1989)492 U.S. 361overruled
- Texas v. Johnson (1989)491 U.S. 397
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. (1989)491 U.S. 1overruled
- Batson v. Kentucky (1986)476 U.S. 79
- Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984)464 U.S. 417
- INS v. Chadha (1983)462 U.S. 919
- Plyler v. Doe (1982)457 U.S. 202
Find legal help in Mark
Practice-area guides and local resources for Mark, Illinois.
Administrative LawAdoption LawAgriculture LawAlimony and Spousal Support LawAlternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust and Trade Regulation LawAppellate LawAsbestos and Mesothelioma LitigationAssault and Battery DefenseAsylum and Refugee LawAviation Accident LitigationBanking and Finance LawBicycle Accident LawBoating Accident LawBonds and Government Finance LawBrain and Spinal Cord Injury LawBurn Injury LawBus Accident LitigationBusiness and Corporate LitigationBusiness Bankruptcy LawBusiness OrganizationsCannabis LawCar Accident LitigationChild Custody LawChild Support LawCitizenship and Naturalization LawCivil Litigation DefenseCivil Rights LawClass Action LitigationCollections LawCommunications and Media LawConstitutional LawConstruction LitigationConsumer Fraud and Deceptive PracticesConsumer ProtectionContingency Fee RepresentationContract LawCriminal Appeals LawCriminal LawCruise Ship Injury LitigationData Privacy and Cybersecurity LawDefamation Libel and Slander LawDivorce LawDog Bite LawDomestic Violence LawDrug Crime DefenseDUI and DWI LawElder LawElection Campaign and Political LawEminent Domain LawEmployee Benefits and ERISA LawEmploymentEmployment-Based Immigration LawEmployment Discrimination LawEnergy and Natural Resources LawEntertainment and Sports LawEnvironmental LawEstate Planning and Probate LawExpungement and Record SealingFair Credit Reporting LawFalse Advertising LawFalse Claims Act LawFamily-Based Immigration LawFamily LawFederal Criminal DefenseForeclosure LawFranchise and Dealership LawGaming LawGovernment Contract LawGrandparents Rights LawGuardianship and Conservatorship LawHealth Care LawHelicopter Crash LawHomicide DefenseIdentity Theft LawImmigration LawInsurance Bad Faith LawInsurance Coverage LawIntellectual Property LawInternet LawJuvenile LawLabor LawLandlord and Tenant LawLand Use and Zoning LawLegal Malpractice LawLemon LawMaritime and Admiralty LawMass Tort LawMass Transit Accident LitigationMedical Malpractice LawMergers and Acquisitions LawMilitary LawMotorcycle Accident LawNative Peoples LawNon Profit LawNursing Home Abuse LitigationPaternity LawPedestrian Accident LawPersonal Bankruptcy LawPersonal InjuryPolice Misconduct LawPremises Liability LawPrenuptial and Marital AgreementsProbate Litigation LawProbation and Parole ViolationsProduct Liability LawRailroad Worker Injury LawReal EstateRemoval and Deportation DefenseRollover Accident LitigationSchool and Education LawSEC and IRS Whistleblower LawSecurities LawSex Crime DefenseSexual Abuse and Assault LawSexual Harassment LawSlip and Fall LawSocial Security Disability LawSpecial Needs Planning LawTax Debt and IRS Disputes LawTax LawTheft and Property Crime DefenseToxic Tort LawTrademark LawTrade Secret LawTraffic Ticket CasesTrain Accident LitigationTransportation LawTruck Accident LitigationUtilities LawVeterans Benefits LawViolent Crime DefenseVisas and Green Cards LawWage and Hour LawWeapons Charge DefenseWhite Collar Criminal DefenseWills and Trusts LawWorkers Compensation LawWrongful Death LawWrongful Termination Law
Other cities in Illinois
Ordered by number of opinions mentioning each city.
- Justice · 119,568
- Standard · 115,757
- Washington · 107,414
- Union · 55,869
- Michael · 53,922
- Ohio · 45,722
- Columbia · 42,184
- Davis · 41,466
- Chicago · 38,725
- Virginia · 37,848
- Lee · 32,752
- Liberty · 29,672
- Normal · 28,677
- Henry · 27,552
- Assumption · 26,877
- Bureau · 25,920
- Worth · 24,820
- Nelson · 24,164
- Russell · 22,743
- Industry · 21,908
- Marshall · 20,826
- Robinson · 19,302
- Kansas · 18,794
- Arthur · 18,693
Opinions mentioning Mark
- 937 F2D 597Jackson v. Centre County
- 937 F2D 586Hilario v. Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs
- 937 F2D 368Fernandez v. Perez
- 937 F2D 288Beaty v. United States
- 937 F2D 1388United States v. Lee
- 936 F2D 981Leffler v. Meer
- 936 F2D 950United States v. Parker
- 936 F2D 870Christopher v. Stouder Memorial Hospital
- 936 F2D 781United States v. McCusker
- 936 F2D 692United States Naval Institute v. Charter Communications, Inc.
- 936 F2D 626United States v. Montminy
- 936 F2D 582R.M. Bell v. City and County of Denver
- 936 F2D 580Tse Saiget Watanabe and McClure Inc v. Gentlecare Systems Inc
- 936 F2D 575United States v. A Love
- 936 F2D 573Pike v. Kroger Company
- 936 F2D 573United States v. Diana Lynn Grant
- 936 F2D 572Brandenburg v. Rl Murphy
- 936 F2D 567Carmelo Aliberti v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
- 936 F2D 435Schlacter-Jones v. General Telephone of California
- 936 F2D 432Lucas v. Natoli
- 936 F2D 387United States v. Eberspacher
- 936 F2D 221United States v. Turner
- 936 F2D 184United States v. Gonzalez-Lira
- 936 F2D 165United States v. Wessells
- 936 F2D 1496N.I.S. Corp. v. Hallahan
- 936 F2D 1169Braswell v. ConAgra, Inc.
- 936 F2D 1096SCFC ILC, Inc. v. Visa USA, Inc.
- 936 F2D 109Chabad-Lubavitch of Vermont v. City of Burlington
- 936 F2D 1United States v. Holder
- 935 F2D 982United States v. Ruiz
- 935 F2D 952United States v. Lee
- 935 F2D 943Waterbury v. Nix
- 935 F2D 909Pirela v. Village of North Aurora
- 935 F2D 64United States v. Alfaro
- 935 F2D 484United States v. Hooper
- 935 F2D 47United States v. Johnson
- 935 F2D 281Sun Products Group, Inc. v. B & E Sales Company, Inc., and Perry Drug Stores, Inc.
- 935 F2D 276United States v. Berger
- 935 F2D 275Shuster v. Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company
- 935 F2D 26719 Fed.r.serv.3d 1379
- 935 F2D 268Weller (Clifton William Iii, Clifton William Iv, Matthew Charles) v. Dept. Of Social Services for City of Baltimore, Juvenile Services Administration, Dept. Of Health and Mental Hygiene for State of Md., Becker (James), Brown (Benjamin), Massinga (Ruth), Dept. Of Human Resources for State of Md., Farrow (Frank), Musgrove (George), Rosinski (Dorothy), Ritterpusch (Dee Ann), Williams (Beverly), Cobbs (Carl), Smith (Carl), McCausey (Michael), Cornish (Herman Ambrose)
- 935 F2D 1501Chicago Typographical Union No. 16 v. Chicago Sun-Times, Inc.
- 935 F2D 1469Illinois ex rel. Burris v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.
- 935 F2D 145Pilchak v. Camper
- 935 F2D 1380United States v. Stevens