City
Mark, Illinois
28,164 opinions mention this place
Mark is a village in Putnam County, Illinois, United States. The population was 491 at the 2000 census. It is part of the Ottawa–Streator Micropolitan Statistical Area.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Landmark decisions involving Mark
- Roper v. Simmons (2005)543 U.S. 551
- Rasul v. Bush (2004)542 U.S. 466
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)539 U.S. 558
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)540 U.S. 93overruled
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 244
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 306
- Atkins v. Virginia (2002)536 U.S. 304
- Ring v. Arizona (2002)536 U.S. 584
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga. (2002)535 U.S. 613
- Harris v. United States (2002)536 U.S. 545overruled
- Bush v. Gore (2000)531 U.S. 98
- Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)521 U.S. 702
- United States v. Lopez (1995)514 U.S. 549
- Walton v. Arizona (1990)497 U.S. 639overruled
- Grady v. Corbin (1990)495 U.S. 508overruled
- Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC (1990)497 U.S. 547overruled
- Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990)494 U.S. 652overruled
- Stanford v. Kentucky (1989)492 U.S. 361overruled
- Texas v. Johnson (1989)491 U.S. 397
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. (1989)491 U.S. 1overruled
- Batson v. Kentucky (1986)476 U.S. 79
- Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984)464 U.S. 417
- INS v. Chadha (1983)462 U.S. 919
- Plyler v. Doe (1982)457 U.S. 202
Find legal help in Mark
Practice-area guides and local resources for Mark, Illinois.
Administrative LawAdoption LawAgriculture LawAlimony and Spousal Support LawAlternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust and Trade Regulation LawAppellate LawAsbestos and Mesothelioma LitigationAssault and Battery DefenseAsylum and Refugee LawAviation Accident LitigationBanking and Finance LawBicycle Accident LawBoating Accident LawBonds and Government Finance LawBrain and Spinal Cord Injury LawBurn Injury LawBus Accident LitigationBusiness and Corporate LitigationBusiness Bankruptcy LawBusiness OrganizationsCannabis LawCar Accident LitigationChild Custody LawChild Support LawCitizenship and Naturalization LawCivil Litigation DefenseCivil Rights LawClass Action LitigationCollections LawCommunications and Media LawConstitutional LawConstruction LitigationConsumer Fraud and Deceptive PracticesConsumer ProtectionContingency Fee RepresentationContract LawCriminal Appeals LawCriminal LawCruise Ship Injury LitigationData Privacy and Cybersecurity LawDefamation Libel and Slander LawDivorce LawDog Bite LawDomestic Violence LawDrug Crime DefenseDUI and DWI LawElder LawElection Campaign and Political LawEminent Domain LawEmployee Benefits and ERISA LawEmploymentEmployment-Based Immigration LawEmployment Discrimination LawEnergy and Natural Resources LawEntertainment and Sports LawEnvironmental LawEstate Planning and Probate LawExpungement and Record SealingFair Credit Reporting LawFalse Advertising LawFalse Claims Act LawFamily-Based Immigration LawFamily LawFederal Criminal DefenseForeclosure LawFranchise and Dealership LawGaming LawGovernment Contract LawGrandparents Rights LawGuardianship and Conservatorship LawHealth Care LawHelicopter Crash LawHomicide DefenseIdentity Theft LawImmigration LawInsurance Bad Faith LawInsurance Coverage LawIntellectual Property LawInternet LawJuvenile LawLabor LawLandlord and Tenant LawLand Use and Zoning LawLegal Malpractice LawLemon LawMaritime and Admiralty LawMass Tort LawMass Transit Accident LitigationMedical Malpractice LawMergers and Acquisitions LawMilitary LawMotorcycle Accident LawNative Peoples LawNon Profit LawNursing Home Abuse LitigationPaternity LawPedestrian Accident LawPersonal Bankruptcy LawPersonal InjuryPolice Misconduct LawPremises Liability LawPrenuptial and Marital AgreementsProbate Litigation LawProbation and Parole ViolationsProduct Liability LawRailroad Worker Injury LawReal EstateRemoval and Deportation DefenseRollover Accident LitigationSchool and Education LawSEC and IRS Whistleblower LawSecurities LawSex Crime DefenseSexual Abuse and Assault LawSexual Harassment LawSlip and Fall LawSocial Security Disability LawSpecial Needs Planning LawTax Debt and IRS Disputes LawTax LawTheft and Property Crime DefenseToxic Tort LawTrademark LawTrade Secret LawTraffic Ticket CasesTrain Accident LitigationTransportation LawTruck Accident LitigationUtilities LawVeterans Benefits LawViolent Crime DefenseVisas and Green Cards LawWage and Hour LawWeapons Charge DefenseWhite Collar Criminal DefenseWills and Trusts LawWorkers Compensation LawWrongful Death LawWrongful Termination Law
Other cities in Illinois
Ordered by number of opinions mentioning each city.
- Justice · 119,568
- Standard · 115,757
- Washington · 107,414
- Union · 55,869
- Michael · 53,922
- Ohio · 45,722
- Columbia · 42,184
- Davis · 41,466
- Chicago · 38,725
- Virginia · 37,848
- Lee · 32,752
- Liberty · 29,672
- Normal · 28,677
- Henry · 27,552
- Assumption · 26,877
- Bureau · 25,920
- Worth · 24,820
- Nelson · 24,164
- Russell · 22,743
- Industry · 21,908
- Marshall · 20,826
- Robinson · 19,302
- Kansas · 18,794
- Arthur · 18,693
Opinions mentioning Mark
- 891 F2D 1034United Mine Workers v. LTV Steel Co.
- 891 F2D 1024Kaplan v. City of Burlington
- 891 F2D 1014Campaneria v. Reid
- 890 F2D 82United States v. Unit No. 7 & Unit No. 8 of Shop in the Grove Condominium
- 890 F2D 77United States v. One (1) 1976 Cessna Model 210L Aircraft
- 890 F2D 679United States v. Gillenwaters
- 890 F2D 628Craftmatic Securities Litigation v. Kraftsow
- 890 F2D 554United States v. Uribe
- 890 F2D 511United States v. Eaton
- 890 F2D 420McCoy v. Kretschmar
- 890 F2D 419United States v. Webster (Mark Arthur)
- 890 F2D 1303Socialist Workers Party v. Hechler
- 890 F2D 1275Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
- 890 F2D 1173United Video, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
- 890 F2D 1128Oakley v. City of Longmont
- 889 F2D 937Weiss v. United States
- 889 F2D 913United States v. Owens-El
- 889 F2D 739Moodie v. School Book Fairs, Inc.
- 889 F2D 524Murrow Furniture Galleries, Inc. v. Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.
- 889 F2D 115Nichol v. Pullman Standard, Inc.
- 889 F2D 1101Bounce, Inc. v. Vo-Toys, Incorporated
- 889 F2D 1091Swords v. Hoffman
- 889 F2D 1089United States v. Carpenter
- 889 F2D 1086Helen Adams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
- 889 F2D 1084Johnson v. R Israel Wm J B D Lr
- 889 F2D 1084Barbara Christiansen Hardin, of the Estate of Anna T. Christiansen, Deceased v. Helen P. Cooper, Randolph W. Cooper, William Ackerman, Bobby E. Crouch
- 889 F2D 1084Gerson U. Kandjii v. Robert Tobash, Sgt., Individually, and in His Official Capacity, Anthony Cuculis, Individually, and in His Official Capacity, and James Helmcamp, Lt., in His Official Capacity William Gossard, in His Official Capacity as Assistant Warden of the Maryland Reception, Diagnostic, and Classification Center and Joseph Wilson, in His Official Capacity as Chief of Security at the Maryland Reception, Diagnostic, and Classification Center and Lewis Ryan, in His Official Capacity as Classification Counselor at the Maryland Reception, Diagnostic, and Classification Center And, Marvin N. Robbins, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Inmate Grievance Commission Merry Coplin, in Her Official Capacity as Warden of the Maryland Reception, Diagnostic, and Classification Center, Gerson U. Kandjii v. Robert Tobash, Sgt., Individually, and in His Official Capacity, Anthony Cuculis, Individually, and in His Official Capacity, and James Helmcamp, Lt., Individually, and in His Official Capacity, William Gossard, in His Official Capacity as Assistant Warden of the Maryland Reception, Diagnostic, and Classification Center And, Joseph Wilson, in His Official Capacity as Chief of Security at the Maryland Reception, Diagnostic, and Classification Center And, Lewis Ryan, in His Official Capacity as Classification Counselor at the Maryland Reception, Diagnostic, and Classification Center And, Marvin Robbins, in His Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Inmate Grievance Commission, Merry Coplin, in Her Official Capacity as Warden of the Maryland Reception, Diagnostic, and Classification Center
- 889 F2D 1018Tally-Ho, Inc. v. Coast Community College District
- 888 F2D 928United States v. Payero
- 888 F2D 578Reutter v. Solem