City
Mark, Illinois
28,164 opinions mention this place
Mark is a village in Putnam County, Illinois, United States. The population was 491 at the 2000 census. It is part of the Ottawa–Streator Micropolitan Statistical Area.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Landmark decisions involving Mark
- Roper v. Simmons (2005)543 U.S. 551
- Rasul v. Bush (2004)542 U.S. 466
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)539 U.S. 558
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)540 U.S. 93overruled
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 244
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 306
- Atkins v. Virginia (2002)536 U.S. 304
- Ring v. Arizona (2002)536 U.S. 584
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga. (2002)535 U.S. 613
- Harris v. United States (2002)536 U.S. 545overruled
- Bush v. Gore (2000)531 U.S. 98
- Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)521 U.S. 702
- United States v. Lopez (1995)514 U.S. 549
- Walton v. Arizona (1990)497 U.S. 639overruled
- Grady v. Corbin (1990)495 U.S. 508overruled
- Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC (1990)497 U.S. 547overruled
- Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990)494 U.S. 652overruled
- Stanford v. Kentucky (1989)492 U.S. 361overruled
- Texas v. Johnson (1989)491 U.S. 397
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. (1989)491 U.S. 1overruled
- Batson v. Kentucky (1986)476 U.S. 79
- Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984)464 U.S. 417
- INS v. Chadha (1983)462 U.S. 919
- Plyler v. Doe (1982)457 U.S. 202
Find legal help in Mark
Practice-area guides and local resources for Mark, Illinois.
Administrative LawAdoption LawAgriculture LawAlimony and Spousal Support LawAlternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust and Trade Regulation LawAppellate LawAsbestos and Mesothelioma LitigationAssault and Battery DefenseAsylum and Refugee LawAviation Accident LitigationBanking and Finance LawBicycle Accident LawBoating Accident LawBonds and Government Finance LawBrain and Spinal Cord Injury LawBurn Injury LawBus Accident LitigationBusiness and Corporate LitigationBusiness Bankruptcy LawBusiness OrganizationsCannabis LawCar Accident LitigationChild Custody LawChild Support LawCitizenship and Naturalization LawCivil Litigation DefenseCivil Rights LawClass Action LitigationCollections LawCommunications and Media LawConstitutional LawConstruction LitigationConsumer Fraud and Deceptive PracticesConsumer ProtectionContingency Fee RepresentationContract LawCriminal Appeals LawCriminal LawCruise Ship Injury LitigationData Privacy and Cybersecurity LawDefamation Libel and Slander LawDivorce LawDog Bite LawDomestic Violence LawDrug Crime DefenseDUI and DWI LawElder LawElection Campaign and Political LawEminent Domain LawEmployee Benefits and ERISA LawEmploymentEmployment-Based Immigration LawEmployment Discrimination LawEnergy and Natural Resources LawEntertainment and Sports LawEnvironmental LawEstate Planning and Probate LawExpungement and Record SealingFair Credit Reporting LawFalse Advertising LawFalse Claims Act LawFamily-Based Immigration LawFamily LawFederal Criminal DefenseForeclosure LawFranchise and Dealership LawGaming LawGovernment Contract LawGrandparents Rights LawGuardianship and Conservatorship LawHealth Care LawHelicopter Crash LawHomicide DefenseIdentity Theft LawImmigration LawInsurance Bad Faith LawInsurance Coverage LawIntellectual Property LawInternet LawJuvenile LawLabor LawLandlord and Tenant LawLand Use and Zoning LawLegal Malpractice LawLemon LawMaritime and Admiralty LawMass Tort LawMass Transit Accident LitigationMedical Malpractice LawMergers and Acquisitions LawMilitary LawMotorcycle Accident LawNative Peoples LawNon Profit LawNursing Home Abuse LitigationPaternity LawPedestrian Accident LawPersonal Bankruptcy LawPersonal InjuryPolice Misconduct LawPremises Liability LawPrenuptial and Marital AgreementsProbate Litigation LawProbation and Parole ViolationsProduct Liability LawRailroad Worker Injury LawReal EstateRemoval and Deportation DefenseRollover Accident LitigationSchool and Education LawSEC and IRS Whistleblower LawSecurities LawSex Crime DefenseSexual Abuse and Assault LawSexual Harassment LawSlip and Fall LawSocial Security Disability LawSpecial Needs Planning LawTax Debt and IRS Disputes LawTax LawTheft and Property Crime DefenseToxic Tort LawTrademark LawTrade Secret LawTraffic Ticket CasesTrain Accident LitigationTransportation LawTruck Accident LitigationUtilities LawVeterans Benefits LawViolent Crime DefenseVisas and Green Cards LawWage and Hour LawWeapons Charge DefenseWhite Collar Criminal DefenseWills and Trusts LawWorkers Compensation LawWrongful Death LawWrongful Termination Law
Other cities in Illinois
Ordered by number of opinions mentioning each city.
- Justice · 119,568
- Standard · 115,757
- Washington · 107,414
- Union · 55,869
- Michael · 53,922
- Ohio · 45,722
- Columbia · 42,184
- Davis · 41,466
- Chicago · 38,725
- Virginia · 37,848
- Lee · 32,752
- Liberty · 29,672
- Normal · 28,677
- Henry · 27,552
- Assumption · 26,877
- Bureau · 25,920
- Worth · 24,820
- Nelson · 24,164
- Russell · 22,743
- Industry · 21,908
- Marshall · 20,826
- Robinson · 19,302
- Kansas · 18,794
- Arthur · 18,693
Opinions mentioning Mark
- 870 F2D 654Floyd Stanley Clayton v. James E. Johnson, William P. Rogers
- 870 F2D 654Convenient Food Mart Inc v. 6-Twelve Convenient Mart Inc
- 870 F2D 627Madison Galleries, Ltd. v. United States
- 870 F2D 40Silverman v. Cbs Inc.
- 870 F2D 1563Action Temporary Services, Inc. v. Labor Force, Inc.
- 870 F2D 1047United States v. Zalman
- 870 F2D 1264Echo Travel, Inc. v. Travel Associates, Inc.
- 869 F2D 870Jennings v. Joshua Independent School District
- 869 F2D 594James Earl Marshall v. Larry W. Huffman Dr. Ozinal Sandra Earley Brenda Ross James Hite Wayne Rankin, P.A.
- 869 F2D 594Mark Allen Spears v. Jim G. Bullock Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, Respondents
- 869 F2D 594T.E. Cuttino Construction Company v. Rigid Steel Structures Mesco Metal Buildings
- 869 F2D 593Shirley M. Heaney John Heaney v. Kinney Shoe Corporation, a New York Corporation
- 869 F2D 531Haire v. United States
- 869 F2D 417United States v. Bradley
- 869 F2D 414United States v. Mason
- 869 F2D 338United States v. Monzon
- 869 F2D 1498United States v. Gilman
- 869 F2D 1496Ficalora v. Lockheed California Company
- 869 F2D 1494United States v. Hardesty
- 869 F2D 1489Cook Tg v. F Trimble
- 869 F2D 1488Branham v. Grinage
- 869 F2D 1264United States v. Vowiell
- 869 F2D 1093United States v. Premises Known as 3639-2nd St., N.E.
- 869 F2D 1048United States v. Fusko
- 868 F2D 524United States v. Salerno
- 868 F2D 473Student Government Ass'n v. Board of Trustees
- 868 F2D 383Jordan v. Shattuck National Bank
- 868 F2D 300van Leeuwen v. United States
- 868 F2D 217Cox v. City of Chicago
- 867 F2D 905Panama Canal Commission v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
- 867 F2D 830United States v. Esquivel-Cortes
- 867 F2D 697Commerce Consultants International, Inc. v. Vetrerie Riunite
- 867 F2D 654Syracuse Peace Council v. Federal Communications Commission
- 867 F2D 616Networx Data Products Co., Inc. v. Dialight Corporation, Inc.
- 867 F2D 616Dabic Dabico v. Craneveyor Corporation
- 867 F2D 616The Wool Bureau, Incorporated v. Warenzeichenverband Fur Freizeit-Und Sportartikel E v. Leipzig
- 867 F2D 614United States v. A Roberts
- 867 F2D 613Telstar, Inc. v. Telstar Corp.
- 867 F2D 611Webbs v. Hyans
- 867 F2D 610Bryan Vuorela v. State of Maryland Montgomery County States Attorney General Robert Dean
- 867 F2D 610United States v. Richard Durham York