City
Mark, Illinois
28,164 opinions mention this place
Mark is a village in Putnam County, Illinois, United States. The population was 491 at the 2000 census. It is part of the Ottawa–Streator Micropolitan Statistical Area.
Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Landmark decisions involving Mark
- Roper v. Simmons (2005)543 U.S. 551
- Rasul v. Bush (2004)542 U.S. 466
- Lawrence v. Texas (2003)539 U.S. 558
- McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)540 U.S. 93overruled
- Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 244
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)539 U.S. 306
- Atkins v. Virginia (2002)536 U.S. 304
- Ring v. Arizona (2002)536 U.S. 584
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga. (2002)535 U.S. 613
- Harris v. United States (2002)536 U.S. 545overruled
- Bush v. Gore (2000)531 U.S. 98
- Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)521 U.S. 702
- United States v. Lopez (1995)514 U.S. 549
- Walton v. Arizona (1990)497 U.S. 639overruled
- Grady v. Corbin (1990)495 U.S. 508overruled
- Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC (1990)497 U.S. 547overruled
- Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990)494 U.S. 652overruled
- Stanford v. Kentucky (1989)492 U.S. 361overruled
- Texas v. Johnson (1989)491 U.S. 397
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. (1989)491 U.S. 1overruled
- Batson v. Kentucky (1986)476 U.S. 79
- Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984)464 U.S. 417
- INS v. Chadha (1983)462 U.S. 919
- Plyler v. Doe (1982)457 U.S. 202
Find legal help in Mark
Practice-area guides and local resources for Mark, Illinois.
Administrative LawAdoption LawAgriculture LawAlimony and Spousal Support LawAlternative Dispute ResolutionAntitrust and Trade Regulation LawAppellate LawAsbestos and Mesothelioma LitigationAssault and Battery DefenseAsylum and Refugee LawAviation Accident LitigationBanking and Finance LawBicycle Accident LawBoating Accident LawBonds and Government Finance LawBrain and Spinal Cord Injury LawBurn Injury LawBus Accident LitigationBusiness and Corporate LitigationBusiness Bankruptcy LawBusiness OrganizationsCannabis LawCar Accident LitigationChild Custody LawChild Support LawCitizenship and Naturalization LawCivil Litigation DefenseCivil Rights LawClass Action LitigationCollections LawCommunications and Media LawConstitutional LawConstruction LitigationConsumer Fraud and Deceptive PracticesConsumer ProtectionContingency Fee RepresentationContract LawCriminal Appeals LawCriminal LawCruise Ship Injury LitigationData Privacy and Cybersecurity LawDefamation Libel and Slander LawDivorce LawDog Bite LawDomestic Violence LawDrug Crime DefenseDUI and DWI LawElder LawElection Campaign and Political LawEminent Domain LawEmployee Benefits and ERISA LawEmploymentEmployment-Based Immigration LawEmployment Discrimination LawEnergy and Natural Resources LawEntertainment and Sports LawEnvironmental LawEstate Planning and Probate LawExpungement and Record SealingFair Credit Reporting LawFalse Advertising LawFalse Claims Act LawFamily-Based Immigration LawFamily LawFederal Criminal DefenseForeclosure LawFranchise and Dealership LawGaming LawGovernment Contract LawGrandparents Rights LawGuardianship and Conservatorship LawHealth Care LawHelicopter Crash LawHomicide DefenseIdentity Theft LawImmigration LawInsurance Bad Faith LawInsurance Coverage LawIntellectual Property LawInternet LawJuvenile LawLabor LawLandlord and Tenant LawLand Use and Zoning LawLegal Malpractice LawLemon LawMaritime and Admiralty LawMass Tort LawMass Transit Accident LitigationMedical Malpractice LawMergers and Acquisitions LawMilitary LawMotorcycle Accident LawNative Peoples LawNon Profit LawNursing Home Abuse LitigationPaternity LawPedestrian Accident LawPersonal Bankruptcy LawPersonal InjuryPolice Misconduct LawPremises Liability LawPrenuptial and Marital AgreementsProbate Litigation LawProbation and Parole ViolationsProduct Liability LawRailroad Worker Injury LawReal EstateRemoval and Deportation DefenseRollover Accident LitigationSchool and Education LawSEC and IRS Whistleblower LawSecurities LawSex Crime DefenseSexual Abuse and Assault LawSexual Harassment LawSlip and Fall LawSocial Security Disability LawSpecial Needs Planning LawTax Debt and IRS Disputes LawTax LawTheft and Property Crime DefenseToxic Tort LawTrademark LawTrade Secret LawTraffic Ticket CasesTrain Accident LitigationTransportation LawTruck Accident LitigationUtilities LawVeterans Benefits LawViolent Crime DefenseVisas and Green Cards LawWage and Hour LawWeapons Charge DefenseWhite Collar Criminal DefenseWills and Trusts LawWorkers Compensation LawWrongful Death LawWrongful Termination Law
Other cities in Illinois
Ordered by number of opinions mentioning each city.
- Justice · 119,568
- Standard · 115,757
- Washington · 107,414
- Union · 55,869
- Michael · 53,922
- Ohio · 45,722
- Columbia · 42,184
- Davis · 41,466
- Chicago · 38,725
- Virginia · 37,848
- Lee · 32,752
- Liberty · 29,672
- Normal · 28,677
- Henry · 27,552
- Assumption · 26,877
- Bureau · 25,920
- Worth · 24,820
- Nelson · 24,164
- Russell · 22,743
- Industry · 21,908
- Marshall · 20,826
- Robinson · 19,302
- Kansas · 18,794
- Arthur · 18,693
Opinions mentioning Mark
- 20 F3D 1050Campbell v. Wood
- 2 F3D 948Federal Deposit Insurance v. Shoop
- 2 F3D 829Trevino v. Dahm
- 2 F3D 64Brooks v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
- 2 F3D 6American Federation of Government Employees, Local 3306 v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
- 2 F3D 752Ball v. City of Chicago
- 2 F3D 508Donatelli v. Mitchell
- 2 F3D 328United States v. $30,440 in U.S. Currency
- 2 F3D 21United States v. Keppler
- 2 F3D 192Washington National Insurance v. Administrators
- 2 F3D 1249Heasley v. Belden & Blake Corp.
- 2 F3D 1180Barth v. Gelb
- 2 F3D 1160Mears v. Singleton
- 2 F3D 105Old Republic Insurance v. Comprehensive Health Care Associates, Inc.
- 2 F3D 1037United States v. Storey
- 2 F3D 1Atlantic Healthcare Benefits Trust v. Googins
- 199 F3D 983Grain Land Coop v. Kar Kim Farms, Inc.
- 199 F3D 547United States v. Gray
- 199 F3D 314Butler v. Owens-Brockway Plastic Products, Inc.
- 199 F3D 20Twombly v. AIG Life Insurance
- 199 F3D 168Montcalm Publishing Corp. v. Virginia
- 199 F3D 160Hoover Color Corp. v. Bayer Corp.
- 199 F3D 140White v. ABCO Engineering Corp.
- 199 F3D 1343GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.
- 199 F3D 108Snider v. Melindez
- 198 F3D 980United States v. Payton
- 198 F3D 935Chiron Corp. v. National Transportation Safety Board
- 198 F3D 944Association of American Railroads v. Department of Transportation
- 198 F3D 921Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
- 198 F3D 843Chase-Baker v. Department of Justice
- 198 F3D 578Mounts v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad
- 198 F3D 306United States v. Coraine
- 198 F3D 293American Honda Motor Co. v. Bernardi's, Inc.
- 198 F3D 1293United States v. Gilbert
- 198 F3D 1201Union Pacific Railroad v. Utah
- 198 F3D 1143Filipino Yellow Pages, Inc. v. Asian Journal Publications, Inc.
- 197 F3D 815Webster v. Edward D. Jones & Co.
- 197 F3D 76American Flint Glass Workers Union v. Anchor Resolution Corp.
- 197 F3D 663At&t Communications of Virginia, Incorporated, and MCI Telecommunications Corporation, a Delaware Corporation McImetro Access Transmission Services of Virginia, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation v. Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Incorporated Hullihen Williams Moore, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission I. Clinton Miller, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission Theodore v. Morrison, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission State Corporation Commission, Commonwealth of Virginia, and Richard Cullen, Attorney General of Virginia, Intervenor-Defendant, and Federal Communications Commission, Party in Interest. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, a Delaware Corporation McImetro Access Transmission Services of Virginia, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation, and At&t Communications of Virginia, Incorporated, Intervenor-Plaintiff v. Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Incorporated Hullihen Williams Moore, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission I. Clinton Miller, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission Theodore v. Morrison, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission State Corporation Commission, Commonwealth of Virginia, and Richard Cullen, Attorney General of Virginia, Intervenor-Defendant, and Federal Communications Commission, Party in Interest. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, a Delaware Corporation McImetro Access Transmission Services of Virginia, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation At&t Communications of Virginia, Incorporated v. Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Incorporated, and Hullihen Williams Moore, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission I. Clinton Miller, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission Theodore v. Morrison, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission State Corporation Commission, Commonwealth of Virginia, and Richard Cullen, Attorney General of Virginia, Intervenor-Defendant, and Federal Communications Commission, Party in Interest
- 197 F3D 568United States v. Sanders
- 197 F3D 173Rutherford v. Harris County
- 197 F3D 200Tsai-Son Nguyen v. Excel Corp.
- 197 F3D 18University Emergency Medicine Foundation v. Rapier Investments, Ltd.
- 197 F3D 560Massachusetts Food Ass'n v. Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission
- 197 F3D 1217Arnold v. City of Columbia
- 197 F3D 1165Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v. Surface Transportation Board
- 196 F3D 854United States v. Taylor
- 196 F3D 83United States v. Coleman
- 196 F3D 207United States v. Rhynes
- 196 F3D 147Merino v. Commissioner