Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 26046
Appeals
Redline — January 1, 2017 → current.View current text →
Current — January 1, 2021
As of January 1, 2017
(a) The review by the court shall not extend further than to determine, based on the whole record of the licensing authority as certified by the panel, whether: (1) The licensing authority has proceeded without or in excess of its jurisdiction. (2) The licensing authority has proceeded in the manner required by law. (3) The decision of the licensing authority is supported by the findings. (4) The findings in the licensing authority’s decision are supported by substantial evidence in the light of the whole record. (5) There is relevant evidence which, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, could not have been produced or which was improperly excluded at the hearing before the licensing authority.
(a) The review by the court shall not extend further than to determine, based on the whole record of the department as certified by the panel, whether: (1) The department has proceeded without or in excess of its jurisdiction. (2) The department has proceeded in the manner required by law. (3) The decision of the department is supported by the findings. (4) The findings in the department’s decision are supported by substantial evidence in the light of the whole record. (5) There is relevant evidence which, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, could not have been produced or which was improperly excluded at the hearing before the department.
(b) Nothing in this chapter shall permit the court to hold a trial de novo, to take evidence, or to exercise its independent judgment on the evidence.
(b) Nothing in this chapter shall permit the court to hold a trial de novo, to take evidence, or to exercise its independent judgment on the evidence.
Official source: California Legislative Information. Reproduced from public-domain California statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.