Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Cal. Gov. Code § 996.4

DEFENSE OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Known as the Government Claims Act

The act spans §§ 810–998 (301 sections).

Applied in 4 court decisions — leading case 27 Cal. App. 4th 168 - Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los Angeles (1994)

Most recently applied in Thornton v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (April 2012)

Added by Stats. 1963, Ch. 1683, Sec. 16.

How often courts cite this section

199320002010201210
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

If after request a public entity fails or refuses to provide an employee or former employee with a defense against a civil action or proceeding brought against him and the employee retains his own counsel to defend the action or proceeding, he is entitled to recover from the public entity such reasonable attorney’s fees, costs and expenses as are necessarily incurred by him in defending the action or proceeding if the action or proceeding arose out of an act or omission in the scope of his employment as an employee of the public entity, but he is not entitled to such reimbursement if the public entity establishes (a) that he acted or failed to act because of actual fraud, corruption or actual malice, or (b) that the action or proceeding is one described in Section 995.4.

Nothing in this section shall be construed to deprive an employee or former employee of the right to petition for a writ of mandate to compel the public entity or the governing body or an employee thereof to perform the duties imposed by this part.

Official source: California Legislative Information. Reproduced from public-domain California statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.