Cal. Pub. Cont. Code § 12100.7
Acquisition of Information Technology Goods and Services
Redline — January 1, 2011 → current.View current text →
Current — January 1, 2013
As of January 1, 2011
As used in this chapter:
As used in this chapter:
(a) “Department” means the Department of General Services.
(b) “Director” means the Director of General Services.
(c) “Information technology” shall have the same definition as set forth in Section 11702 of the Government Code.
(a) “Multiple award schedule” (MAS) is an agreement established between the General Services Administration of the United States and certain suppliers to do business under specific prices, terms, and conditions for specified goods, information technology, and services.
(b) “Multiple award” means a contract of indefinite quantity for one or more similar goods, information technology, or services to more than one supplier.
(f) “Office” means the office in the department, by whatever name it may be called, which is responsible for contracting for goods and information technology, and is headed by the state procurement officer.
(g) “Procedures” means the specific methods or courses of action to implement policies for information technology procurement.
(h) For purposes of this chapter, “policies” may be defined as setting general principles and standards for the acquisition of information technology.
(c) “Procedures” means the rules, methods, and practices to be followed in conducting information technology procurements.
(d) “Policies” means determining what information technology goods or services are to be purchased and by whom.
(e) For purposes of this chapter, “value-effective acquisition” may be defined to include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) The operational cost that the state would incur if the bid or proposal is accepted. (2) Quality of the product or service, or its technical competency. (3) Reliability of delivery and implementation schedules. (4) The maximum facilitation of data exchange and systems integration. (5) Warranties, guarantees, and return policy. (6) Supplier financial stability. (7) Consistency of the proposed solution with the state’s planning documents and announced strategic program direction. (8) Quality and effectiveness of business solution and approach. (9) Industry and program experience. (10) Prior record of supplier performance. (11) Supplier expertise with engagements of similar scope and complexity. (12) Extent and quality of the proposed participation and acceptance by all user groups. (13) Proven development methodologies and tools. (14) Innovative use of current technologies and quality results.
Official source: California Legislative Information. Reproduced from public-domain California statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.