Fla. Stat. § 670.108

Relationship to Electronic Fund Transfer Act

Known as the Uniform Commercial Code

The act spans §§ 670–670 (39 sections).

Applied in 1 court decision — leading case Gilbert & Caddy, P.A. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (2016)

Most recently applied in Gilbert & Caddy, P.A. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (June 2016)

History.--s. 1, ch. 91-70; s. 3, ch. 2016-53.

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), this chapter does not apply to a funds transfer any part of which is governed by the Electronic Fund Transfer Act of 1978 (Title XX, Pub. L. No. 95-630, 92 Stat. 3728, 15 U.S.C. ss. 1693 et seq.), as amended from time to time.

(2) This chapter applies to a funds transfer that is a remittance transfer as defined in the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. s. 1693o-1, as amended from time to time, unless the remittance transfer is an electronic fund transfer as defined in the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C s. 1693a, as amended from time to time.

(3) If there is an inconsistency between a funds transfer under this chapter and the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act governs the inconsistency.

Official source: Online Sunshine (Florida Legislature). Reproduced from public-domain Florida statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.