Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

O.C.G.A. § 17-8-76

Argument to or in front of jury as to possibility of clemency

Applied in 6 court decisions — leading case California v. Ramos (1983)

Most recently applied in Cargill v. Turpin (August 1997)

— Ga

How often courts cite this section

19831990199720
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(a) No attorney at law in a criminal case shall argue to or in the presence of the jury that a defendant, if convicted, may not be required to suffer the full penalty imposed by the court or jury because pardon, parole, or clemency of any nature may be granted by the Governor, the State Board of Pardons and Paroles, or other proper authority vested

with the right to grant clemency.

(b) If counsel for either side in a criminal case argues to or in the presence of the jury as provided in subsection (a) of this Code section, opposing counsel shall have the right immediately to request the court to declare a mistrial, in which case it shall be mandatory upon the court

to declare a mistrial. Failure to declare a mistrial shall constitute

reversible error.

(c) This Code section shall be construed as setting forth requirements in addition to other requirements of law.

Current official text: Official Code of Georgia Annotated (LexisNexis). Digitized from the Internet Archive scan of the OCGA. Reproduced from public-domain Georgia statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.