O.C.G.A. § 7-1-628
Purpose; legislative findings; scope of part
Redline — December 1, 2018 → current.View current text →
Current — July 1, 2022
As of December 1, 2018
(1) It is the purpose of this part to permit interstate banking and branching by merger under Section 102 of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994, subject to the limitations and requirements set out in this part and in Parts 14, 15, 18, and 19 of this article.
(1) It is the purpose of this part to permit interstate banking and branching by merger under Section 102 of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994, subject to the limitations and requirements set out in this part and in Parts 14, 18, and 19 of this article.
(2) The scope of this part covers mergers where, upon consummation of the interstate merger transaction, the resulting bank will have banking locations in Georgia and at least one other state. It provides for certain approval, notice, and other requirements. Mergers involving banks having present and resulting branches located only in this state are governed by Parts 14 and 15 of this article. To the extent a bank participating in an interstate merger transaction is owned or controlled by a bank holding company, the applicable provisions of Part 19 of this article shall also apply.
(2) The scope of this part covers mergers where, upon consummation of the interstate merger transaction, the resulting bank will have banking locations in Georgia and at least one other state. It provides for certain approval, notice, and other requirements.
(3) In authorizing the expansion of interstate banking to this state, and in the interests of its citizens, the General Assembly finds that primary consideration should be given to the following: Affording protection and promoting convenience to bank depositors and other customers of financial institutions in this state;
(3) In authorizing the expansion of interstate banking to this state, and in the interests of its citizens, the General Assembly finds that primary consideration should be given to the following: Affording protection and promoting convenience to bank depositors and other customers of financial institutions in this state;
(4) Preserving the advantages of a sound dual banking system and the competitive equality of state chartered institutions with federally chartered institutions; and
(4) Preserving the advantages of a sound dual banking system and the competitive equality of state chartered institutions with federally chartered institutions; and
(5) Providing to the Department of Banking and Finance sufficient powers and responsibilities to implement these considerations.
(5) Providing to the Department of Banking and Finance sufficient powers and responsibilities to implement these considerations.
(6) This part is not intended to discriminate against out-of-state bank holding companies or against foreign bank holding companies in any manner that would violate Section 3(d) of the Bank Holding Company Act, as amended by the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994.
(6) This part is not intended to discriminate against out-of-state bank holding companies or against foreign bank holding companies in any manner that would violate Section 3(d) of the Bank Holding Company Act, as amended by the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994.
Current official text: Official Code of Georgia Annotated (LexisNexis). Digitized from the Internet Archive scan of the OCGA. Reproduced from public-domain Georgia statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.