Ind. Code § 25-2.1-9-5
Peer review immunity
Redline — January 1, 2018 → current.View current text →
Current — January 1, 2025
As of January 1, 2018
Sec. 5. An:
Sec. 5. An:
(1) entity administering a quality review program before July 1, 2012, or a peer review program after June 30, 2012;
(1) entity administering a peer review program;
(2) officer, member, or employee of an entity administering a quality review program before July 1, 2012, or a peer review program after June 30, 2012;
(2) officer, member, or employee of an entity administering a peer review program;
(3) employee or member of a quality review committee before July 1, 2012, or a peer review committee after June 30, 2012; and
(3) employee or member of a peer review committee; and
(4) entity in which or for which a member of a quality review committee (before July 1, 2012) or peer review committee (after June 30, 2012) is a sole proprietor, a partner, a shareholder, a member, or an employee;
(4) entity in which or for which a member of a peer review committee is a sole proprietor, a partner, a shareholder, a member, or an employee;
is immune from civil liability that would otherwise arise from communications, supervision, findings, recommendations, evaluations, reports, opinions, or other actions taken or omissions occurring in good faith in the course and scope of the duties of a quality review administering entity (before July 1, 2012) or peer review administering entity (after June 30, 2012) or a quality review committee (before July 1, 2012) or peer review committee (after June 30, 2012) that arise under this article, including the rules adopted by the board. The immunity granted under this section includes immunity for an act or omission related to any part of a quality review conducted under this article before July 1, 2012, that becomes part of a peer review conducted or peer review report issued after June 30, 2012.
is immune from civil liability that would otherwise arise from communications, supervision, findings, recommendations, evaluations, reports, opinions, or other actions taken or omissions occurring in good faith in the course and scope of the duties of a peer review administering entity or a peer review committee that arise under this article, including the rules adopted by the board.
Official source: Indiana General Assembly. Reproduced from public-domain Indiana statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.