N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-567.64
Modifying or vacating of awards
Redline — December 1, 2021 → current.View current text →
Current — April 1, 2022
As of December 1, 2021
Subject to the relevant provisions of federal law and any applicable international agreement in force between the United States of America and any other nation or nations, an arbitral award may be vacated by a court only upon a showing that the award is tainted by illegality, or substantial unfairness in the conduct of the arbitral proceedings. In determining whether an award is tainted, the court shall consider the provisions of this Article, but shall not engage in de novo review of the subject matter of the dispute giving rise to the arbitration proceedings.
Subject to the relevant provisions of federal law and any applicable international agreement in force between the United States of America and any other nation or nations, an arbitral award may be vacated by a court only upon a showing that the award is tainted by illegality, or substantial unfairness in the conduct of the arbitral proceedings. In determining whether an award is tainted, the court shall consider the provisions of this Article, but shall not engage in de novo review of the subject matter of the dispute giving rise to the arbitration proceedings.
History
(1991, c. 292, s. 1; 2003-345, s. 3; 2017-171, s. 1.)
Effect of Amendments. - Session Laws 2017-171, s. 1, substituted "federal law and any" for "federal law or any"; and substituted "award is tainted, the court shall consider the provisions of this Article," for "award is so tainted, the superior court shall have regard to the provisions of this Article, and of G.S. 1-569.23 and G.S. 1-569.24." For effective date and applicability, see editor's note.
Official source: North Carolina General Assembly. Reproduced from public-domain North Carolina statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.