Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 10B-99

Presumption of regularity

Applied in 4 court decisions — leading case 233 N.C. App. 493 - In Re Adoption of "Baby Boy" (2014)

Most recently applied in 266 N.C. App. 84 - Sfreddo v. Hicks (June 2019)

2006-59, s. 24; 2006-199, s. 4; 2013-204, s. 1.10.

How often courts cite this section

2014201910
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

(a) In the absence of evidence of fraud on the part of the notary, or evidence of a knowing and deliberate violation of this Article by the notary, the courts shall grant a presumption of regularity to notarial acts so that those acts may be upheld, provided there has been substantial compliance with the law. Nothing in this Chapter modifies or repeals the common law doctrine of substantial compliance in effect on November 30, 2005.

(b) A notarial act shall be deemed valid if it complies with the law as it existed on or before December 1, 2005. This section applies to notarial acts whenever performed.

Official source: North Carolina General Assembly. Reproduced from public-domain North Carolina statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.