N.Y. C.P.L.R. 5305
Personal jurisdiction
Redline — January 1, 2015 → current.View current text →
Current — January 1, 2022
As of January 1, 2015
§ 5305. Personal jurisdiction. (a) Bases of jurisdiction. The foreign\ncountry judgment shall not be refused recognition for lack of personal\njurisdiction if:\n 1. the defendant was served personally in the foreign state;\n 2. the defendant voluntarily appeared in the proceedings, other than\nfor the purpose of protecting property seized or threatened with seizure\nin the proceedings or of contesting the jurisdiction of the court over\nhim;\n 3. the defendant prior to the commencement of the proceedings had\nagreed to submit to the jurisdiction of the foreign court with respect\nto the subject matter involved;\n 4. the defendant was domiciled in the foreign state when the\nproceedings were instituted, or, being a body corporate had its\nprincipal place of business, was incorporated, or had otherwise acquired\ncorporate status, in the foreign state;\n 5. the defendant had a business office in the foreign state and the\nproceedings in the foreign court involved a cause of action arising out\nof business done by the defendant through that office in the foreign\nstate; or\n 6. the defendant operated a motor vehicle or airplane in the foreign\nstate and the proceedings involved a cause of action arising out of such\noperation.\n (b) Other bases of jurisdiction. The courts of this state may\nrecognize other bases of jurisdiction.\n
§ 5305. Personal jurisdiction. (a) A foreign country judgment may not\nbe refused recognition for lack of personal jurisdiction if:\n 1. the defendant was served with process personally in the foreign\ncountry;\n 2. the defendant voluntarily appeared in the proceeding, other than\nfor the purpose of protecting property seized or threatened with seizure\nin the proceeding or of contesting the jurisdiction of the court over\nthe defendant;\n 3. the defendant prior to the commencement of the proceeding had\nagreed to submit to the jurisdiction of the foreign court with respect\nto the subject matter involved;\n 4. the defendant was domiciled in the foreign country when the\nproceeding was instituted or was a corporation or other form of business\norganization that had its principal place of business in, or was\norganized under the laws of, or had otherwise acquired corporate status,\nin the foreign country;\n 5. the defendant had a business office in the foreign country and the\nproceeding in the foreign court involved a cause of action arising out\nof business done by the defendant through that office in the foreign\ncountry; or\n 6. the defendant operated a motor vehicle or airplane in the foreign\ncountry and the proceeding involved a cause of action arising out of\nsuch operation.\n (b) The courts of this state may recognize bases of personal\njurisdiction other than those listed in subdivision (a) of this section\nas sufficient to support a foreign country judgment.\n
Official source: NYS Open Legislation (New York State Senate). Reproduced from public-domain New York statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.