Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 919

Enforcement

Redline — January 1, 2022 → current.View current text →
Current — January 1, 2023
As of January 1, 2022
* § 919. Airport transactions. If an airport operator, including but\nnot limited to the public authority responsible for regulating commerce\nat such airport within the state, requests that a peer-to-peer car\nsharing program enter into an airport concession agreement, such\npeer-to-peer car sharing program shall enter into a written agreement,\nwhere the peer-to-peer car sharing program or shared vehicle owner uses\nthe program to:\n 1. list vehicles parked on airport property or at airport facilities;\n 2. contract for transportation to or from airport property or airport\nfacilities;\n 3. facilitate the use of a shared vehicle to transport airport\npassengers on or off airport property; or\n 4. promote or market a shared vehicle to transport airport passengers\non or off airport property.\n * NB Effective March 22, 2022\n
§ 919. Enforcement. 1. Except where a different penalty is\nspecifically imposed pursuant to any provision of this article, any\npeer-to-peer car sharing program found by a court of competent\njurisdiction to have violated a provision of this article shall be\nsubject to a penalty of not less than five hundred dollars nor more than\none thousand dollars for each violation.\n 2. (a) Whenever there shall be a violation of this section, an\napplication may be made by the attorney general in the name of the\npeople of the state of New York to a court of competent jurisdiction by\na special proceeding for the imposition of a fine or the issuance of an\ninjunction against any violation of this section, upon notice to such\npeer-to-peer car sharing program of not less than five days, to enjoin\nand restrain the continuance of such violations.\n (b) If the court finds that the defendant has, in fact, violated this\nsection, an injunction may be issued by such court, enjoining and\nrestraining any further violation, without requiring proof that any\nperson has, in fact, been injured or damaged thereby.\n (c) In any proceeding authorized pursuant to this subdivision, the\ncourt may direct restitution and make allowances to the attorney general\nas provided in section sixty-three of the executive law.\n (d) In support of any application pursuant to this subdivision, the\nattorney general is authorized to take proof, determine relevant fact\nand issue subpoenas in accordance with the civil practice law and rules.\n 3. Any clause or provision of a peer-to-peer car sharing agreement\ninconsistent with the provisions of this article shall be deemed void as\nagainst public policy.\n

Official source: NYS Open Legislation (New York State Senate). Reproduced from public-domain New York statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.