Known as the Oregon Subdivision and Series Partition Control Law
The act spans §§ 92–92 (166 sections).
Applied in 6 court decisions — leading case Brown v. City of Medford (2012)
Most recently applied in Brown v. City of Medford (July 2012)
1955 c.756 §3; 1973 c.696 §4; 1991 c.763 §4; 2005 c.399 §2
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
(1) A person may not create a street or road for the purpose of subdividing or partitioning an area or tract of land without the approval of the city or county having jurisdiction over the area or tract of land to be subdivided or partitioned.
(2) Notwithstanding ORS 92.175, an instrument dedicating land to public use may not be accepted for recording in this state unless the instrument bears the approval of the city or county authorized by law to accept the dedication.
Official source: Oregon State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Oregon statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.