Short title; purpose
Known as the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act
The act spans §§ 26-6-10 to 26-6-90 (21 sections).
Applied in 2 court decisions — leading case Brent D. Benjamin v. Elizabeth D. Walker (2016)
Most recently applied in Traynum v. Scavens (April 2016)
2004 Act No. 279, SECTION 1.
(A) This chapter may be cited as the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act".
(B) Consistent with the provisions of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 7002(a), this chapter provides alternative procedures or requirements for the use of electronic records to establish the legal effect or validity of records in electronic transactions.
Official source: South Carolina Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain South Carolina statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.