Livestock facility siting and expansion
Applied in 3 court decisions — leading case Adams v. State Livestock Facilities Siting Review Board (2012)
Most recently applied in 387 Wis. 2d 687 - Enbridge Energy Company, Inc. v. Dane County (June 2019)
2003 a. 235; 2013 a. 80; 2017 a. 365.
Court decisions citing this, by year. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.
(1) STATEWIDE CONCERN. This section is an enactment of statewide concern for the purpose of providing uniform regulation of livestock facilities.
(1m) DEFINITIONS. In this section:
(a) “Animal unit” has the meaning given in s. NR 243.03 (3), Wis. Adm. Code.
Official source: Wisconsin State Legislature. Reproduced from public-domain Wisconsin statutes; confirm against the official source for the current text. Not legal advice.