Public-domain · open source

20 U.S.C. § 2911

Section 2911 · 2911, 2912. Omitted

Applied in 5 court decisions — leading case Thomas by and Through Thomas v. Davidson Academy (1994)

Most recently applied in Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. San Francisco Unified School District, and United States Department of Education Lamar Alexander, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Education, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. Board of Education of the San Francisco Unified School District, City and County of San Francisco, State of California Ramon Cortines, Superintendent of Schools, San Francisco Unified School District San Francisco Unified School District, Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. San Francisco Unified School District, City and County of San Francisco, State of California, and Deborah Martin Jacob Perea Barbara Perea, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. William Honig, as California Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education California State Board of Education, and San Francisco Unified School District, Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. Board of Education of the San Francisco Unified School District San Francisco Unified School District, City and County of San Francisco, State of California Ramon Cortines, Superintendent of Schools, San Francisco Unified School District, United States Department of Education Deborah Martin Lamar Alexander, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Education Jacob Perea Barbara Perea, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees (January 1995)

How often courts cite this section

citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year.Markers show enactment, consequential amendments, and circuit splits over this section — watch for a citation surge after a change or a disagreement. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.