40 U.S.C. § 759
Section 759 · Procurement, maintenance, operation and utilization of automatic data processing equipment
Amended 10 times on record
(1) The Administrator is authorized and directed to coordinate and provide for the economic and efficient purchase, lease, and maintenance of automatic data processing equipment by Federal agencies.
(2)(A) For purposes of this section, the term “automatic data processing equipment” means any equipment or interconnected system or subsystems of equipment that is used in the automatic acquisition, storage, manipulation, management, movement, control, display, switching interchange, transmission, or reception, of data or information—
(i) by a Federal agency, or
(ii) under a contract with a Federal agency which—
(I) requires the use of such equipment, or
(II) requires the performance of a service or the furnishing of a product which is performed or produced making significant use of such equipment.
(B) Such term includes—
(i) computers;
(ii) ancillary equipment;
(iii) software, firmware, and similar procedures;
(iv) services, including support services; and
(v) related resources as defined by regulations issued by the Administrator for General Services.
(3) This section does not apply to—
(A) automatic data processing equipment acquired by a Federal contractor which is incidental to the performance of a Federal contract;
(B) radar, sonar, radio, or television equipment;
(C) the procurement by the Department of Defense of automatic data processing equipment or services if the function, operation, or use of which—
(i) involves intelligence activities;
(ii) involves cryptologic activities related to national security;
(iii) involves the command and control of military forces;
(iv) involves equipment which is an integral part of a weapon or weapons system; or
(v) is critical to the direct fulfillment of military or intelligence missions, provided that this exclusion shall not include automatic data processing equipment used for routine administrative and business applications such as payroll, finance, logistics, and personnel management; or
(D) the procurement of automatic data processing equipment or services by the Central Intelligence Agency.
(1) Automatic data processing equipment suitable for efficient and effective use by Federal agencies shall be provided by the Administrator through purchase, lease, transfer of equipment from other Federal agencies, or otherwise, and the Administrator is authorized and directed to provide by contract or otherwise for the maintenance and repair of such equipment. In carrying out his responsibilities under this section the Administrator is authorized to transfer automatic data processing equipment between Federal agencies, to provide for joint utilization of such equipment by two or more Federal agencies, and to establish and operate equipment pools and data processing centers for the use of two or more such agencies when necessary for its most efficient and effective utilization.
(2) The Administrator may delegate to one or more Federal agencies authority to operate automatic data processing equipment pools and automatic data processing centers, and to lease, purchase, or maintain individual automatic data processing systems or specific units of equipment, including such equipment used in automatic data processing pools and automatic data processing centers, when such action is determined by the Administrator to be necessary for the economy and efficiency of operations, or when such action is essential to national defense or national security. The Administrator may delegate to one or more Federal agencies authority to lease, purchase, or maintain automatic data processing equipment to the extent to which he determines such action to be necessary and desirable to allow for the orderly implementation of a program for the utilization of such equipment.
(3) If the Administrator finds that a senior official of an agency designated pursuant to section 3506(b) of title 44 is sufficiently independent of program responsibility and has sufficient experience, resources, and ability to carry out fairly and effectively procurements under this section, the Administrator may delegate to such official the authority to lease, purchase, or maintain automatic data processing equipment pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection, except that any such delegation shall not relieve the Administrator of the responsibilities assigned to the Administrator under this section. A delegation by the Administrator under this subsection shall not preclude the Administrator from reviewing individual procurement requests if the Administrator determines that circumstances warrant such a review. The Administrator shall retain authority to revoke such delegations, both in general and with regard to any specific matter, including the authority to revoke a delegation of authority with respect to a particular contract after award of the contract, except that the Administrator may revoke a delegation of authority after the contract is awarded only when there is a finding of a violation of law or regulation in connection with the contract award..1 In acting for the Administrator, any official to whom approval authority has been delegated under this subsection shall comply fully with the rules and regulations promulgated by the Administrator.
The proviso following paragraph (4) in section 481(a) of this title and the provisions of section 474(d) of this title shall have no application in the administration of this section. No other provision of this Act or any other Act which is inconsistent with the provisions of this section shall be applicable in the administration of this section.
(1) The Secretary of Commerce shall, on the basis of standards and guidelines developed by the National Bureau of Standards pursuant to section 278g–3(a)(2) and (3) of title 15, promulgate standards and guidelines pertaining to Federal computer systems, making such standards compulsory and binding to the extent to which the Secretary determines necessary to improve the efficiency of operation or security and privacy of Federal computer systems. The President may disapprove or modify such standards and guidelines if he determines such action to be in the public interest. The President's authority to disapprove or modify such standards and guidelines may not be delegated. Notice of such disapproval or modification shall be submitted promptly to the Committee on Government Operations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate and shall be published promptly in the Federal Register. Upon receiving notice of such disapproval or modification, the Secretary of Commerce shall immediately rescind or modify such standards or guidelines as directed by the President.
(2) The head of a Federal agency may employ standards for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive information in a Federal computer system within or under the supervision of that agency that are more stringent than the standards promulgated by the Secretary of Commerce, if such standards contain, at a minimum, the provisions of those applicable standards made compulsory and binding by the Secretary of Commerce.
(3) The standards determined to be compulsory and binding may be waived by the Secretary of Commerce in writing upon a determination that compliance would adversely affect the accomplishment of the mission of an operator of a Federal computer system, or cause a major adverse financial impact on the operator which is not offset by Government-wide savings. The Secretary may delegate to the head of one or more Federal agencies authority to waive such standards to the extent to which the Secretary determines such action to be necessary and desirable to allow for timely and effective implementation of Federal computer systems standards. The head of such agency may redelegate such authority only to a senior official designated pursuant to section 3506(b) of title 44. Notice of each such waiver and delegation shall be transmitted promptly to the Committee on Government Operations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate and shall be published promptly in the Federal Register.
(4) The Administrator shall revise the Federal information resources management regulations (41 CFR ch. 201) to be consistent with the standards and guidelines promulgated by the Secretary of Commerce under this subsection.
(5) As used in this subsection, the terms “Federal computer system” and “operator of a Federal computer system” have the meanings given in section 278g–3(d) of title 15.
The authority conferred upon the Administrator and the Secretary of Commerce by this section shall be exercised subject to direction by the President and to fiscal and policy control exercised by the Office of Management and Budget. Authority so conferred upon the Administrator shall not be so construed as to impair or interfere with the determination by agencies of their individual automatic data processing equipment requirements, including the development of specifications for and the selection of the types and configurations of equipment needed. The Administrator shall not interfere with, or attempt to control in any way, the use made of automatic data processing equipment or components thereof by any agency. The Administrator shall provide adequate notice to all agencies and other users concerned with respect to each proposed determination whether or not the automatic data processing equipment will be provided by the Administrator or whether or not the authority to lease, purchase, or maintain the equipment will be delegated. If the Administrator denies an agency procurement request such denial shall be subject to review and decision by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, unless the President otherwise directs. Such review and decision shall be made only on the basis of a written appeal, and such written appeal, together with any written communications to the Administrator or any officer or employee of the Office of Management and Budget concerning such denial shall be made available to the public.
(1) Upon request of an interested party in connection with any procurement that is subject to this section (including any such procurement that is subject to delegation of procurement authority), the board of contract appeals of the General Services Administration (hereafter in this subsection referred to as the “board”) shall review, as provided in this subsection, any decision by a contracting officer that is alleged to violate a statute, a regulation, or the conditions of a delegation of procurement authority. Such review shall be conducted under the standard applicable to review of contracting officer final decisions by boards of contract appeals. The authority of the board to conduct such review shall include the authority to determine whether any procurement is subject to this section and the authority to review regulations to determine their consistency with applicable statutes. A proceeding, decision, or order of the board pursuant to this subsection shall not be subject to interlocutory appeal or review. An interested party who has filed a protest under subchapter V of chapter 35 of title 31, with respect to a procurement or proposed procurement may not file a protest with respect to that procurement or proposed procurement under this subsection.
(2)(A) When a protest under this subsection is filed before the award of a contract in a protested procurement, the board, at the request of an interested party and within 10 days of the filing of the protest, shall hold a hearing to determine whether the board should suspend the procurement authority of the Administrator or the Administrator's delegation of procurement authority for the protested procurement on an interim basis until the board can decide the protest.
(B)(i) The board shall suspend the procurement authority of the Administrator or the Administrator's delegation of procurement authority unless the Federal agency concerned establishes that—
(I) absent action by the board, contract award is likely to occur within 30 days of the hearing; and
(II) urgent and compelling circumstances which significantly affect interests of the United States will not permit waiting for the decision of the board.
(ii) A suspension under this subparagraph shall not preclude the Federal agency concerned from continuing the procurement process up to but not including award of the contract unless the board determines such action is not in the best interests of the United States.
(3)(A)(i) If, with respect to an award of a contract, the board receives notice of a protest under this subsection within the period described in clause (ii), the board shall, at the request of an interested party, hold a hearing to determine whether the board should suspend the procurement authority of the Administrator or the Administrator's delegation of procurement authority for the protested procurement on an interim basis until the board can decide the protest.
(ii) The period referred to in clause (i) is the period beginning on the date on which the contract is awarded and ending at the end of the later of—
(I) the tenth day after the date of contract award; or
(II) the fifth day after the debriefing date offered to an unsuccessful offeror for any debriefing that is requested and, when requested, is required.
(iii) The board shall hold the requested hearing within 5 days after the date of the filing of the protest or, in the case of a request for debriefing under the provisions of section 2305(b)(5) of title 10 or section 303B(e) of this Act [41 U.S.C. 253b(e)], within 5 days after the later of the date of the filing of the protest or the date of the debriefing.
(B) The board shall suspend the procurement authority of the Administrator or the Administrator's delegation of procurement authority to acquire any goods or services under the contract which are not previously delivered and accepted unless the Federal agency concerned establishes that urgent and compelling circumstances which significantly affect interests of the United States will not permit waiting for the decision of the board.
(4)(A) The board shall conduct such proceedings and allow such discovery as may be required for the expeditious, fair, and reasonable resolution of the protest.
(B) Subject to any deadlines imposed by section 9(a) of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (41 U.S.C. 608(a)), the board shall give priority to protests filed under this subsection. The board shall issue its final decision within 65 days after the date of the filing of the protest, unless the board's chairman determines that the specific and unique circumstances of the protest require a longer period, in which case the board shall issue such decision within the longer period determined by the chairman. An amendment which adds a new ground of protest should be resolved, to the maximum extent practicable, within the time limits established for resolution of the initial protest.
(C) The board may dismiss a protest that the board determines—
(i) is frivolous;
(ii) has been brought or pursued in bad faith; or
(iii) does not state on its face a valid basis for protest.
(5)(A) In making a decision on the merits of protests brought under this section, the board shall accord due weight to the policies of this section and the goals of economic and efficient procurement set forth in this section. The board may consider any decision, determination, opinion, or statement made by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget or any officer of any other Federal agency regarding applicability of this section to a particular procurement, and may request the advice of the Director or such officer with regard to such applicability, but shall not be bound by any such decision, determination, opinion, or statement when determining whether a procurement is subject to this section.
(B) If the board determines that a challenged agency action violates a statute or regulation or the conditions of any delegation of procurement authority issued pursuant to this section, the board may suspend, revoke, or revise the procurement authority of the Administrator or the Administrator's delegation of procurement authority applicable to the challenged procurement.
(C) Whenever the board makes such a determination, it may, in accordance with section 1304 of title 31, further declare an appropriate prevailing party to be entitled to the cost of filing and pursuing the protest (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and consultant and expert witness fees), and bid and proposal preparation. However, no party (other than a small business concern (within the meaning of section 632(a) of title 15)) may be declared entitled to costs for consultants and expert witness fees that exceed the highest rate of compensation for expert witnesses paid by the Federal Government, and no party (other than a small business concern (within the meaning of section 632(a) of title 15)) may be declared entitled to attorneys’ fees that exceed $150 per hour unless the board, on a case by case basis, determines that an increase in the cost of living or a special factor, such as the limited availability of qualified attorneys for the proceedings involved, justifies a higher fee.
(D) Any agreement that provides for the dismissal of a protest and involves a direct or indirect expenditure of appropriated funds shall be submitted to the board and shall be made a part of the public record (subject to any protective order considered appropriate by the board) before dismissal of the protest. If a Federal agency is a party to a settlement agreement, the submission of the agreement to the board shall include a memorandum, signed by the contracting officer concerned, that describes in detail the procurement, the grounds for protest, the Federal Government's position regarding the grounds for protest, the terms of the settlement, and the agency's position regarding the propriety of the award or proposed award of the contract at issue in the protest.
(E) Payment of amounts due from an agency under subparagraph (C) or under the terms of a settlement agreement under subparagraph (D) shall be made from the appropriation made by section 1304 of title 31 for the payment of judgments. The Federal agency concerned shall reimburse that appropriation account out of funds available for the procurement.
(6)(A) The final decision of the board may be appealed by the head of the Federal agency concerned and by any interested party, including interested parties who intervene in any protest filed under this subsection, as set forth in the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (41 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
(B) If the board revokes, suspends, or revises the procurement authority of the Administrator or the Administrator's delegation of procurement authority after the contract award, the affected contract shall be presumed valid as to all goods or services delivered and accepted under the contract before the suspension, revocation, or revision of such procurement authority or delegation.
(C) Nothing contained in this subsection shall affect the board's power to order any additional relief which it is authorized to provide under any statute or regulation. However, the procedures set forth in this subsection shall only apply to procurements conducted under the authority contained in this section. In addition, nothing contained in this subsection shall affect the right of any interested party to file a protest with the contracting agency or to file an action in a district court of the United States or the United States Court of Federal Claims.
(7)(A) The board shall adopt and issue such rules and procedures as may be necessary to the expeditious disposition of protests filed under the authority of this subsection.
(B) The procedures shall provide that, in the computation of any period described in this subsection—
(i) the day of the act, event, or default from which the designated period of time begins to run not be included; and
(ii) the last day after such act, event, or default be included, unless—
(I) such last day is a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday; or
(II) in the case of a filing of a paper at the board, such last day is a day on which weather or other conditions cause the closing of the board in which event the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday shall be included.
(C) The procedures may provide for electronic filing and dissemination of documents and information required under this subsection and in so providing shall consider the ability of all parties to achieve electronic access to such documents and records.
(D) The procedures shall provide that if the board expressly finds that a protest or a portion of a protest is frivolous or has been brought or pursued in bad faith, or that any person has willfully abused the board's process during the course of a protest, the board may impose appropriate procedural sanctions, including dismissal of the protest.
(8) Repealed. Pub. L. 103–355, title I, §1437(2), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3294.
(9) For purposes of this subsection:
(A) The term “protest” means a written objection by an interested party to any of the following:
(i) A solicitation or other request by a Federal agency for offers for a contract for the procurement of property or services.
(ii) The cancellation of such a solicitation or other request.
(iii) An award or proposed award of such a contract.
(iv) A termination or cancellation of an award of such a contract, if the written objection contains an allegation that the termination or cancellation is based in whole or in part on improprieties concerning the award of the contract.
(B) The term “interested party” means, with respect to a contract or proposed contract described in subparagraph (A), an actual or prospective bidder or offeror whose direct economic interest would be affected by the award of the contract or by failure to award the contract.
(C) The term “prevailing party”, with respect to a determination of the board under paragraph (5)(B) that a challenged action of a Federal agency violates a statute or regulation or the conditions of a delegation of procurement authority issued pursuant to this section, means a party that demonstrated such violation.
The justifications and approvals required by section 253(f)(1) of title 41 shall apply in the case of any procurement under this section for which the minimum needs are so restrictive that only one manufacturer is capable of satisfying such needs. Such procurement includes either a sole source procurement or a procurement by specific make and model. Such justification and approval shall be required notwithstanding that more than one bid or offer is made or that the procurement obtains price competition and such procurement shall be treated as a procurement using procedures other than competitive procedures for purposes of section 417(b) of title 41.
(1) The Administrator shall collect and compile data regarding the procurement of automatic data processing equipment under this section. The data collected and compiled shall include, at a minimum, with regard to each contract for such a procurement, the following:
(A) The procuring agency.
(B) The contractor.
(C) The automatic data processing equipment and services procured.
(D) The manufacturer of the equipment procured.
(E) The amount of the contract, to the extent that the amount is not proprietary information.
(F) The type of contract used.
(G) The extent of competition for award.
(H) Whether compatibility restrictions were used in awarding the contract.
(I) Significant modifications of the contract.
(J) Contract price, to the extent that the price is not proprietary information.
(2) The head of each Federal agency shall report to the Administrator in accordance with regulations issued by the Administrator all information that the Administrator determines necessary in order to satisfy the requirements in paragraph (1).
(3) The Administrator—
(A) shall carry out a systematic, periodic review of information received under this subsection;
(B) shall use such information, as appropriate, to determine the compliance of Federal agencies with the requirements of this section; and
(C) may take appropriate corrective action regarding an agency's authority to lease and purchase automatic data processing equipment upon any substantial failure by the head of the agency to report to the Administrator in accordance with this subsection.
(4) The Administrator shall take appropriate corrective action upon failure of a Federal agency to comply with the terms of any delegation of authority to lease or purchase automatic data processing equipment or failure to comply with any applicable law or regulation.
(5) The Administrator shall require in the regulations implementing this subsection that (A) data collected pursuant to this subsection be drawn from existing Federal agency information; and (B) no new or additional information reporting requirements may be imposed on offerors or contractors to collect such data.
This section may be cited as the “Brooks Automatic Data Processing Act”.
Editorial notes U.S. Code · Office of the Law Revision Counsel
References in Text
This Act, referred to in subsec. (c), is act June 30, 1949, ch. 288, 63 Stat. 377, as amended, known as the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 471 of this title and Tables.
The Contract Disputes Act of 1978, referred to in subsec. (f)(6)(A), is Pub. L. 95–563, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2383, as amended, which is classified principally to chapter 9 (§601 et seq.) of Title 41, Public Contracts. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 601 of Title 41 and Tables.
Codification
Pub. L. 99–591 is a corrected version of Pub. L. 99–500.
Section was formerly classified to section 630g–2 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
Amendments
1994—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 103–355, §1431, inserted before period at end of third sentence “, including the authority to revoke a delegation of authority with respect to a particular contract after award of the contract, except that the Administrator may revoke a delegation of authority after the contract is awarded only when there is a finding of a violation of law or regulation in connection with the contract award.”
Subsec. (f)(1). Pub. L. 103–355, §1432, amended first sentence generally. Prior to amendment, first sentence read as follows: “Upon request of an interested party in connection with any procurement which is subject to this section (including procurements subject to delegation of procurement authority), the board of contract appeals of the General Services Administration (hereafter in this subsection referred to as the ‘board’), shall review any decision by a contracting officer alleged to violate a statute or regulation.”
Subsec. (f)(2)(B). Pub. L. 103–355, §1433(a)(1), designated existing provisions as cl. (i), redesignated former cls. (i) and (ii) as subcls. (I) and (II), respectively, of cl. (i), and added cl. (ii).
Subsec. (f)(3)(A). Pub. L. 103–355, §1433(a)(2), added subpar. (A) and struck out former subpar. (A) which read as follows: “If the board receives notice of a protest under this subsection after the contract has been awarded but within 10 days after the contract award, the board shall, at the request of an interested party and within 10 days after the date of the filing of the protest, hold a hearing to determine whether the board should suspend the procurement authority of the Administrator or the Administrator's delegation of procurement authority for the challenged procurement on an interim basis until the board can decide the protest.”
Subsec. (f)(4)(B). Pub. L. 103–355, §1433(b), substituted “65 days” for “45 working days” and inserted at end “An amendment which adds a new ground of protest should be resolved, to the maximum extent practicable, within the time limits established for resolution of the initial protest.”
Subsec. (f)(4)(C). Pub. L. 103–355, §1434, added subpar. (C) and struck out former subpar. (C) which read as follows: “The board may dismiss a protest the board determines is frivolous or which, on its face, does not state a valid basis for protest.”
Subsec. (f)(5)(C). Pub. L. 103–355, §1435(a), added subpar. (C) and struck out former subpar. (C) which read as follows: “Whenever the board makes such a determination, it may, in accordance with section 1304 of title 31, further declare an appropriate interested party to be entitled to the costs of—
“(i) filing and pursuing the protest, including reasonable attorney's fees, and
“(ii) bid and proposal preparation.”
Subsec. (f)(5)(D), (E). Pub. L. 103–355, §1436, added subpars. (D) and (E).
Subsec. (f)(7). Pub. L. 103–355, §1437(1), added par. (7).
Subsec. (f)(8). Pub. L. 103–355, §1437(2), struck out par. (8) which read as follows: “Not later than January 15, 1985, the board shall adopt and issue such rules and procedures as may be necessary to the expeditious disposition of protests filed under the authority of this subsection.”
Subsec. (f)(9). Pub. L. 103–355, §1438(1), substituted “subsection:” for “subsection—” in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (f)(9)(A). Pub. L. 103–355, §1438(2), added subpar. (A) and struck out former subpar. (A) which read as follows: “the term ‘protest’ means a written objection by an interested party to a solicitation by a Federal agency for bids or proposals for a proposed contract for the procurement of property or services or a written objection to a proposed award or the award of such a contract; and”.
Subsec. (f)(9)(B). Pub. L. 103–355, §1438(3), substituted “The term” for “the term”.
Subsec. (f)(9)(C). Pub. L. 103–355, §1435(b), added subpar. (C).
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 103–355, §1439, added subsec. (h).
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 103–355, §10005(f)(3), added subsec. (i).
1992—Subsec. (f)(6)(C). Pub. L. 102–572 substituted “United States Court of Federal Claims” for “United States Claims Court”.
1988—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 100–235 amended subsec. (d) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (d) read as follows: “The Secretary of Commerce is authorized (1) to provide agencies, and the Administrator of General Services in the exercise of the authority delegated in this section, with scientific and technological advisory services relating to automatic data processing and related systems, and (2) to make appropriate recommendations to the President relating to the establishment of uniform Federal automatic data processing standards. The Secretary of Commerce is authorized to undertake the necessary research in the sciences and technologies of automatic data processing computer and related systems, as may be required under provisions of this subsection.”
1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(m) [title VIII, §822(a)], designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added pars. (2) and (3).
Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(m) [title VIII, §822(b)], added par. (3).
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(m) [title VIII, §821(b)(1)], redesignated subsec. (e) as (c) and struck out former subsec. (c) which provided for establishment of automatic data processing fund and uses of fund and required an annual report.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(m) [title VIII, §821(b)(1)], redesignated subsec. (f) as (d) and struck out former subsec. (d) which related to capital of automatic data processing fund, credits for fund, and transfer of net income to Treasury at close of each fiscal year.
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(m) [title VIII, §821(b)(1)(B)], redesignated subsec. (g) as (e). Former subsec. (e) redesignated (c).
Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(m) [title VIII, §825], substituted “exercised by the Office of Management and Budget” for “exercised by the Bureau of the Budget”.
Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(m) [title VIII, §823], substituted “whether or not the automatic data processing equipment will be provided by the Administrator or whether or not the authority to lease, purchase, or maintain the equipment will be delegated” for “specifically affecting them or the automatic data processing equipment or components used by them” and “If the Administrator denies an agency procurement request such denial shall be subject to review and decision by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, unless the President otherwise directs. Such review and decision shall be made only on the basis of a written appeal, and such written appeal, together with any written communications to the Administrator or any officer or employee of the Office of Management and Budget concerning such denial shall be made available to the public” for “In the absence of mutual agreement between the Administrator and the agency or user concerned, such proposed determinations shall be subject to review and decision by the Office of Management and Budget unless the President otherwise directs”.
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(m) [title VIII, §821(b)(1)(B)], redesignated subsec. (h) as (f). Former subsec. (f) redesignated (d).
Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(m) [title VIII, §824], in par. (1) substituted “in connection with any procurement which is subject to this section” for “in connection with any procurement conducted under the authority of this section”, “subject to delegation” for “conducted under delegations” and inserted provision that the authority of the board include authority to determine whether a procurement is subject to this section and authority to review regulations for consistency and providing that a proceeding, decision, or order not be subject to interlocutory appeal or review, and in par. (5)(A) inserted provision that the board may consider opinions of other Federal agencies but not be bound by such opinions.
Subsecs. (g) to (i). Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(m) [title VIII, §821(b)(1)(B)], redesignated subsecs. (g) to (i) as (e) to (g), respectively.
1985—Subsec. (h)(3)(A). Pub. L. 99–145, §1304(c)(1), substituted “board” for “Board”.
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 99–145, §961(c), added subsec. (i).
1984—Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 98–369 added subsec. (h).
Change of Name
Committee on Government Operations of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Government Reform and Oversight of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Fourth Congress, Jan. 4, 1995.
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
For effective date and applicability of amendment by Pub. L. 103–355, see section 10001 of Pub. L. 103–355, set out as a note under section 251 of Title 41, Public Contracts.
Effective Date of 1992 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date of 1986 Amendment
Amendment by section 101(m) [title VIII, §821(b)(1)] of Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591 effective Jan. 1, 1987, and amendment by section 101(m) [title VIII, §§822–825] of Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591 effective Oct. 18, 1986, see section 101(m) [title VIII, §833] of Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591, set out as a note under section 757 of this title.
Effective Date of 1985 Amendment
Amendment by section 961(c) of Pub. L. 99–145 effective as if included in enactment of Competition in Contracting Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title VII, see section 961(e) of Pub. L. 99–145, set out as a note under section 2304 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
Effective and Termination Date of 1984 Amendment
Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title VII, §2713(b), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1184, which provided that amendment of this section by section 2713 of Pub. L. 98–369 would cease to be effective on Jan. 15, 1988, was repealed by Pub. L. 99–500, §101(m) [title VIII, §831], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–308, 1783–344, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(m) [title VIII, §831], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–308, 3341–344.
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–369 applicable with respect to any protest filed after Jan. 14, 1985, see section 2751(b) of Pub. L. 98–369, set out as a note under section 251 of Title 41, Public Contracts.
Delegation of Functions
Functions, authority, and responsibility of Director of Office of Management and Budget under this section delegated to Administrator for Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in Office of Management and Budget pursuant to Pub. L. 96–511, §3(b), Dec. 11, 1980, 94 Stat. 2825, set out as a note under section 3503 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.
Functions of Office of Management and Budget approving standards on behalf of President pursuant to subsec. (f)(2) of this section transferred to Secretary of Commerce, see section 2 of Ex. Ord. No. 11717, May 9, 1973, 38 F.R. 12315, set out as a note under section 501 of Title 31, Money and Finance.
Definitions
The definitions in section 472 of this title apply to this chapter.
Computer Security
Sections 1, 2, 5–8 of Pub. L. 100–235 provided that:
“SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
“This Act [enacting sections 278g–3 and 278g–4 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, amending section 759 of this title and section 272 of Title 15, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 271 of Title 15] may be cited as the ‘Computer Security Act of 1987’.
“SEC. 2. PURPOSE.
“(a) In General.—The Congress declares that improving the security and privacy of sensitive information in Federal computer systems is in the public interest, and hereby creates a means for establishing minimum acceptable security practices for such systems, without limiting the scope of security measures already planned or in use.
“(b) Specific Purposes.—The purposes of this Act are—
“(1) by amending the Act of March 3, 1901 [15 U.S.C. 271 et seq.], to assign to the National Bureau of Standards responsibility for developing standards and guidelines for Federal computer systems, including responsibility for developing standards and guidelines needed to assure the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive information in Federal computer systems, drawing on the technical advice and assistance (including work products) of the National Security Agency, where appropriate;
“(2) to provide for promulgation of such standards and guidelines by amending section 111(d) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 [40 U.S.C. 759(d)];
“(3) to require establishment of security plans by all operators of Federal computer systems that contain sensitive information; and
“(4) to require mandatory periodic training for all persons involved in management, use, or operation of Federal computer systems that contain sensitive information.
“SEC. 5. FEDERAL COMPUTER SYSTEM SECURITY TRAINING.
“(a) In General.—Each Federal agency shall provide for the mandatory periodic training in computer security awareness and accepted computer security practice of all employees who are involved with the management, use, or operation of each Federal computer system within or under the supervision of that agency. Such training shall be—
“(1) provided in accordance with the guidelines developed pursuant to section 20(a)(5) of the National Bureau of Standards Act (as added by section 3 of this Act) [15 U.S.C. 278g–3(a)(5)], and in accordance with the regulations issued under subsection (c) of this section for Federal civilian employees; or
“(2) provided by an alternative training program approved by the head of that agency on the basis of a determination that the alternative training program is at least as effective in accomplishing the objectives of such guidelines and regulations.
“(b) Training Objectives.—Training under this section shall be started within 60 days after the issuance of the regulations described in subsection (c). Such training shall be designed—
“(1) to enhance employees’ awareness of the threats to and vulnerability of computer systems; and
“(2) to encourage the use of improved computer security practices.
“(c) Regulations.—Within six months after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 8, 1988], the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall issue regulations prescribing the procedures and scope of the training to be provided Federal civilian employees under subsection (a) and the manner in which such training is to be carried out.
“SEC. 6. ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES FOR COMPUTER SYSTEMS SECURITY AND PRIVACY.
“(a) Identification of Systems That Contain Sensitive Information.—Within 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act [Jan. 8, 1988], each Federal agency shall identify each Federal computer system, and system under development, which is within or under the supervision of that agency and which contains sensitive information.
“(b) Security Plan.—Within one year after the date of enactment of this Act [Jan. 8, 1988], each such agency shall, consistent with the standards, guidelines, policies, and regulations prescribed pursuant to section 111(d) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 [40 U.S.C. 759(d)], establish a plan for the security and privacy of each Federal computer system identified by that agency pursuant to subsection (a) that is commensurate with the risk and magnitude of the harm resulting from the loss, misuse, or unauthorized access to or modification of the information contained in such system. Copies of each such plan shall be transmitted to the National Bureau of Standards and the National Security Agency for advice and comment. A summary of such plan shall be included in the agency's five-year plan required by section 3505 of title 44, United States Code. Such plan shall be subject to disapproval by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. Such plan shall be revised annually as necessary.
“SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.
“As used in this Act, the terms ‘computer system’, ‘Federal computer system’, ‘operator of a Federal computer system’, ‘sensitive information’, and ‘Federal agency’ have the meanings given in section 20(d) of the National Bureau of Standards Act (as added by section 3 of this Act) [15 U.S.C. 278g–3(d)].
“SEC. 8. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION OF ACT.
“Nothing in this Act, or in any amendment made by this Act, shall be construed—
“(1) to constitute authority to withhold information sought pursuant to section 552 of title 5, United States Code; or
“(2) to authorize any Federal agency to limit, restrict, regulate, or control the collection, maintenance, disclosure, use, transfer, or sale of any information (regardless of the medium in which the information may be maintained) that is—
“(A) privately-owned information;
“(B) disclosable under section 552 of title 5, United States Code, or other law requiring or authorizing the public disclosure of information; or
“(C) public domain information.”