Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

49 U.S.C. § 10906

Section 10906 · Exception

Amended 1 time on record

Applied in 50 court decisions — leading case Hayfield Northern Railroad v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. (1984)

Most recently applied in 2020 IL App (1st) 190836 - Coulas Viking Partners v. Belt Ry. Co. of Chicago (June 2020)

How often courts cite this section

1982199020002010202080Hayfield Northern Railroad v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.leading · 1984 · Hayfield Northern Railroad v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year.Markers show enactment, consequential amendments, and circuit splits over this section — watch for a citation surge after a change or a disagreement. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

Notwithstanding section 10901 and subchapter II of chapter 113 of this title, and without the approval of the Board, a rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part may enter into arrangements for the joint ownership or joint use of spur, industrial, team, switching, or side tracks. The Board does not have authority under this chapter over construction, acquisition, operation, abandonment, or discontinuance of spur, industrial, team, switching, or side tracks.

Editorial notes U.S. Code · Office of the Law Revision Counsel

Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10907 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).

A prior section 10906, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1406, related to offering abandoned rail properties for sale for public purposes, prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a). See section 10905 of this title.

/49/usc/10906 · .json · Public domain