Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 U.S. 243

Respublica v. Gordon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 1, 1788

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1788-01

<p> Attainder. </p> <p>A suggestion of attainder dismissed by the court, on the ground, that it would contravene the treaty of peace with Great Britain.</p>

Relies on Anonymous

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1788-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1977

1 state decisions

2017881790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Attainder.

¶2A suggestion of attainder dismissed by the court, on the ground, that it would contravene the treaty of peace with Great Britain.

¶3The.defendant was included in an act of proclamation issued during the late war, and not appearing within the time prescribed, was attainted of treason, for adhering to the king of Great Britain, in consequence of which, his estate was confiscated to the use of the commonwealth, but it had never been taken into possession.

¶4He returned, since the peace, to the state of Pennsylvania, and applied *244to the executive council, representing that he was a minor at the time of the Attainder, and was forcibly prevented by his guardian from joining the American army — for which reasons he prayed a restoration of his estate. The council said, they were ready to grant him a pardon, but that they had it not in their power to restore his estate, which was a matter of legislative jurisdiction. Mr. Gordon, therefore, addressed several members of the general assembly, but he was there answered, that the executive council, or the supreme court of justice, was the proper tribunal to hear and determine the merits of his case. The defendant, by the advice of his counsel, again applied to the executive power, and requested, that, to bring the matter before the judges, the attorney-general might be directed to file a suggestion in the supreme court, of the defendant’s being attainted in the manner above mentioned.

¶5This being done accordingly, Mr. Gordon gave bail for his appearance, and two pleas, 1st, infancy, and 2d, duress, were filed, to the suggestion thus made, on the behalf of the commonwealth; to the former of these, the attorney-general demurred, and joined issue on the latter.

¶6But now, the Chieb Justice delivered the opinion of the court, that anj proceedings against Mr. Gordon, the defendant, would contravene an express article in the treaty of peace and amity, entered into between the United States of America and Great Britain, for which reason, they could not sustain the suggestion filed by the attorney-general. And the defendant was accordingly discharged, (a)

/1/us/243 · .json · Public domain