Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 U.S. 169

Marriot v. Davey

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1786-03

Held: that a settlement of an administration account, in the orphans’ court, was not conclusive, in an action for a distributive share.

1 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1786-03

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1912

11 state decisions

3017861790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Action for legacy.

¶2A settlement of an administration account by referees, on a citation before tbe register, held not to be conclusive, in an action for a legacy.

¶3This was an action brought by a residuary legatee under the act of the 12 Geo. III., c. 16 (1 Sm. L. 333), to which the defendant pleaded fully administered. The plaintiff, thereupon, moved for the appointment of auditors ; but the defendant objected, because his account had been already left, by consent, to referees, on a former citation before the register of wills, &c.

¶4Rawle, for the plaintiff. Sergeant, for the defendant.

¶5The Court,

¶6however, determined, that the former settlement was not conclusive ; and that, by the words of the act, it was intended, new auditors should be appointed, ex tempore, upon the plea of want of assets, (a)

/1/us/169 · .json · Public domain