Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 U.S. 18

Riche v. Broadfield

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided APRIL TERM, 1768.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1768-04

Cited by 4 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1807

Relies on Lessee of the Proprietary v. Ralston · Gorgerat v. M'Carty

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1768-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1William Allen, Chief Justice, John Lawrence and Thomas Willing, Justices.

¶2Evidence.

¶3An account of sales of an adventure shipped to New York, said to be signed by the factor, offered in evidence, to prove a loss on the goods. Objected, that the factor himself ought to have been brought to give evidence, vivd voce, or, at least, the account should have been proved by him, and certified under the city seal of New York, agreeable to the directions of the act of parliament with regard to the proving colony debts in England. Answered, That this being a mercantile transaction, such evidence as merchants usually admit as proofs of a foreign transaction, should be received here.

¶4*19*By the Court.

¶5The strict rules of law with regard to ev idenee ought not to be extended to mercantile transactions, (a) In this case, on proving the handwriting of the factor, let the account of sales he given in evidence ; which was accordingly done.

/1/us/18 · .json · Public domain