Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

106 U.S. 620

United States v. Wilson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 1, 1882

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1882-10

Circuit Court of the United States for the Middle District of Tennessee. In a foreclosure suit, commenced Oct. 24, 1874, against the Saint Louis and Southeastern Railway Company, the court appointed a receiver to manage the- affairs, of the company and issue certificates of indebtedness.

Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1884

2 counsel of record

Cited in Black's (1910)’s definition of “Circulation”

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · 9–0 · Decided 1882-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Certificates of indebtedness issued by á person or a corporation are not taxable as “ circulation,” under sect. 3408, Rev. Stat., unless they were calculated or intended to circulate or to be used as money.

¶2Appeal from the .Circuit United States · Case Law">Court of the United States for the Middle District of Tennessee.

¶3In a foreclosure suit, commenced Oct. 24, 1874, against the Saint Louis and Southeastern Railway Company, the court appointed a receiver to manage the- affairs, of the company and issue certificates of indebtedness. The order appointing him was modified, Dec. 7, 1874, so as to authorize and allow him “ for the purpose of providing money to make payments. on account of the balance of purchase-money due- the State' of •Tennessee for-the road sold as the Edgefield & Kentucky Railroad, from time to time to issue his certificates, which, altogether, shall not exceed two hundred and fifty thousand dollars oh so much of the road mentioned in the pleadings as lies and is situated in the State of Tennessee, in such general form as may be approved of by complainants, providing for the payment thereof out of any of the- moneys as aré applicable for .that purpose, which certificates shall bear interest at a rate not ex*621ceeding ten per cent, per annum, and the sums represented by such certificates shall, unless previously discharged, be paid out of any moneys realized upon a foreclosure and sale of.the mortgaged property within the jurisdiction of this court equally with any other liability incurred by the receiver in the management of said railroad and the protection of the said property coming into his hands as receiver aforesaid. And it is further ordered that said certificates may be sold below par if necessary so to do.”

¶4Certificates in the following form —

¶5“No. 3491.] [1874.

¶6“Saint Lotus and Southeastern Railway Company.

¶7“ Certificate of' indebtedness, good for twenty dollars, to H. W. Gardiner, paymaster, or bearer, payable at the office of the treasurer, Saint.Louis, Mo., four months after date, with interest at the rate of ten per cent, per annum. Good only when countersigned by the paymaster of the company.

¶8“ J. F. Alexander, Treasurer.

¶9“ I. P. Hains, Auditor.

¶10(On margin: ) “ Countersigned :

¶11“ H. W. Gardiner, Paymaster.

¶12“148. $20.00.] [Due Dec. 6,1874.

¶13“ Twenty-five per cent. of. freight bills due the company may be paid in these certificates at their face value before maturity thereof.”

¶14— were, from October, 1873, to November, 1874, issued for labor done and supplies arid machinery furnished the company. The receiver accepted them when overdue for freights and debts accruing to the company, or paid them out at their face value with interest.

¶15The United States filed a petition against Wilson, the re- ■ ceiver, praying for leave to iritervene, and alleging that the company was indebted to it in an amount assessed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue on account of circulating certificates of indebtedness, from October, 1873, to May, 1875, and also for the month of May, 1875, and for interest and penalties by reason of Wilson’s failure to pay the same on notice and demand. The United States insisted that the amount due *622was a prior claim upon the fund in his hands, and that he be directed to pay the same.

¶16' The court dismissed the petition, and the United States appealed.

¶17The Solicitor-General for the United States.

¶18There-was no opposing counsel.

¶19Mr. Chief Justice Waite

¶20delivered the opinion of the court.

¶21We are not satisfied that the certificates of indebtedness, on account of which the United- States have assessed the taxes petitioned for, were calculated or intended to circulate or to be used as money. They were not, therefore, taxable as “ circulation under the third clause • of sect. 8408 of the Revised Statutes. •

¶22Decree affirmed.

/106/us/620 · .json · Public domain