Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

144 U.S. 197

Rice v. Sanger

Supreme Court of the United States

Submitted March 21, 1892.

Decided March 28, 1892.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1892-03-28

<p>ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE KANSAS.</p> <p>Motion to dismiss. The case is stated in the opinion.</p>

Cited by 27 later decisions (9 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1903 · most notably Hume v. Bowie (1893), Beasley v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. (1903)

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Pope Manufacturing Co. v. Gormully & Jeffery Manufacturing Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Petition denied / appeal dismissed · 8–0 · Decided 1892-03-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE KANSAS.

¶2The judgment of the Supreme Court of a State iñ a case which is remanded by that court to the trial court and retried there, is not a final judgment which can be reviewed by this court.

¶3Motion to dismiss. The case is stated in the opinion.

¶4Mr. William A. MeKenney and Mr. J. D. McGl&verty' for the motion.

¶5Mr. F. F. Ware opposing.

¶6The Chief Justice :

¶7This was an action commenced by one Rice against Sanger et al. in the District Court of Bourbon County, Kansas, wherein judgment was rendered February 27, 1888, in favor of plaintiff. The cause was thereupon taken by the defendants to the Supreme Court of that State, the judgment reversed, and the cause remandad for further proceedings in accordance with the views of the court as expressed in its written opinion. To review this judgment, a writ of error from this court was allowed, but after that, the case went back to the state district court in accordance with the-mandate of the Supreme Court, and was subsequently tried therein.

¶8The judgment attempted to be brought here was not a final judgment, and the writ of error is Dismissed.

/144/us/197 · .json · Public domain