Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 F.3d 907 - Gorman v. Bartch

Gorman v. Bartch’s Empirical Analysis

152 F.3d 907 · 1998

Citation profile

133
cited by 133 later decisions
3
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

48 federal appellate · 25 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 133 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Lee v. City of Los Angeles (2001), Randolph v. Rodgers (1999)

48 federal appellate · 25 district · 4 state decisions

6101998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 29 U.S.C. § 794A · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12133 (§ 203 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12181 (§ 301 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Hafer v. Melo · Watt v. Alaska

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 133 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “denied him the benefit of post-arrest transportation appropriate in light of his disability”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “No otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States ... shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.