168 U.S. 705
Docket No. 429.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1897-11-08
<p>Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.</p>
2 counsel of record
Relies on Hurtado v. People of the State of California · Craemer v. State of Washington
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1897-11-08
Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1948
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
¶2Mr. William F. Fitzgerald and Mr. T. C. Catchings for motions to dismiss or affirm.
¶3Mr. A. L. Hart and Mr. F. P. Dewees opposing.
¶5Einal order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Hurtado v. California, 110 U. S. 516; Nordstrom v. Washington, 164 U. S. 705; Craemer v. Washington, 168 U. S. 124.