171 U.S. 92 - Clark v. Fitzgerald — 171 U.S. 92

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 1962

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA.

¶2The answer given to the fourth question in Del Monte Mining and Milling Co. v. Last Chance Mining and Milling Co. ante, 55, compels an affirmance of the judgment below in this case.

¶3The case was thus stated by the plaintiff in error in his brief.

¶4The plaintiff in error is the owner and in possession of the Black Bock lode mining claim situated in the Summit Yalley mining district in Silver Bow County, Montana.

¶5The defendants in error own two thirds interest, and the plaintiff in error one third interest in the Niagara lode mining claim situated in the same district and county. The Niagara lode lies along side of the Black Bock lode so that the south side line of the Niagara forms or is a part of the north side line of the Black Bock lode.

¶6The Black Bock lode is the older of the two locations. As appears from the pleadings in the cause the vein or lode crosses the east end line and south side line of the Niagara lode 513 feet west of the northeast corner of the Black Bock lode and dips to the south and under the surface of the Black Bock lode claim.

¶7The plaintiff in error entered upon that part of the vein, east of the point where it crosses the division side line between the Black Bock and Niagara lode claims and extracted ore *93from.the said vein on its dip under the Black Rock lode at the point above described, and which is designated on the diagram as “ ore bodies.”

¶8Thereupon the defendants in error, who as stated supra, own two thirds interest in the Niagara' lode claim brought an action asking for an accounting and judgment for two thirds the value of the ore extracted by the plaintiff in error. Judgment was rendered against the plaintiff in error for the sum of $27,242.54, being two thirds the value of the ore extracted and for the- cost of the suit.

¶9An- appeal was taken to the Supreme Court of the State and the judgment of the lower court was affirmed.

¶10Mr. Robert B. Smith for plaintiff in error. Mr. Robert L. Wood was on his brief.

¶11Mr. James W. Forbis for defendants in error.

¶12Mr. Justice Brewer

¶13delivered the opinion of the court.

¶14.The case is before us on error to the Supreme Court of Montana. It is unnecessary to state its facts in detail, and it is sufficient to say that the answer given to the fourth question in the opinion just filed in Del Monte Mining Co. v. Last Chance Mining Co., ante, 55, compels an affirmance of the judgment.

¶15Affirmed.