¶1No judgment is final which does not terminate the litigation between the parties. A judgment reversing the judgment of an inferior court, and remanding the cause for such other and further proceedings as to law and justice shall appertain, does not do this. A writ of error to such a judgment dismissed, on the authority of Moore v. Robbins, supra, p. 588.
¶2Error to-the Supreme Court of Illinois.
¶3The county of St. Clair, in Illinois, sued Lovingston in the Circuit Court of the county, and got judgment against him. The Supreme Court of 'Illinois reversed this judgment, and remanded the cause “ for such other and further proceedings as to law and justice shall appertain.” To that judgment the county took this writ of error.
¶4Mr. G. Koerner, for the plaintiff in error; Mr. W. II. Underwood, contra
¶6delivered the opinion of the court.
¶7The writ of error in this case must be dismissed on the authority of Moore v. Robbins, decided at this term. The judgment of the Supreme Court of the State cannot be regarded as a final judgment in the sense in-which the term was used in the Judiciary Acts. No judgment is final which does not terminate .the litigation between the parties to the *629suit. The issue between the parties may be again tried in the Circuit Court, and another judgment may be recovered, which may be removed to the Supreme Court for revision. Consequently, then, there has been no final determination of the case.
¶8Writ dismissed.