¶1In error to the Supreme Court of *629the State of Illinois. Submitted April 12, 1904. Decided April 18, 1904. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction nunc pro tunc as of April 7, 1904, on the .authority of Lehigh Water Company v. Easton, 121 U. S. 388; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Central Land Company v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103, 112, and cases cited; Chapin v. Fye, 179 U. S. 127, 129; New Orleans Waterworks Company v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336. Mr. Fred F. Beers for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Thomas N. Haskins for defendants in error..
194 U.S. 628
Docket No. 216.
Brewster v. Cahill
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 18, 1904
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1904-04-18
Cited by 5 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1915
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relies on Central Land Co of West Virginia v. Laidley · Eustis v. Bolles · Lehigh Water Co v. Corporation of Borough of Easton
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1904-04-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →