Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 KAN 732 - Porter v. State

Porter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1969
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Douglas v. People of State of California · Smith v. Crouse · Smith v. Crouse · Pea v. United States · Daegele v. Kansas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘When any defendant has been convicted of a felony and he is without means to employ counsel to perfect an appeal to the supreme court, he may make affidavit to that effect, stating that he intends to appeal and requesting the appointment of counsel. The judge of the court in which such defendant was convicted shall, when satisfied that the affidavit is true, appoint competent counsel to conduct such appeal.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.