Martin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont))
Relationships
Relies on Almanza v. State · Dinkins v. State · Hutch v. State · Prystash v. State · Tamez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The charge itself; (2) The state of the evidence, including contested issues and the weight of the probative evidence; (3) Arguments of counsel; (4) Any other relevant information revealed by the record of the trial as a whole.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carr v. State · In Re FLR
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.