Fowler v. State

                                        Cite as 

                   SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
                                           No.   CR-12-481

                                                      Opinion Delivered September   19, 2013

JAMIE LYNN FOWLER                                     PRO SE MOTION FOR RULE ON
                               PETITIONER             CLERK [YELL COUNTY CIRCUIT
                                                      COURT, 75CR-08-33, HON. JERRY
V.                                                    RAMEY, JUDGE]

STATE OF ARKANSAS
                             RESPONDENT               MOTION DENIED.


                                          PER CURIAM

       In 2010, petitioner Jamie Lynn Fowler was found guilty by a jury of manufacturing

methamphetamine and possession of drug paraphernalia, and he was sentenced as a habitual

offender to an aggregate term of 780 months’ imprisonment. The Arkansas Court of Appeals

affirmed. Fowler v. State, 

. Petitioner subsequently filed in the circuit court

a pro se petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1

(2010). The petition was denied on October 5, 2011. Petitioner timely filed a notice of appeal

from the order on October 19, 2011, but he did not tender the record to this court within ninety

days of the date of the notice of appeal as required by Arkansas Rule of Appellate

Procedure–Criminal 4(b) (2011).1 Now before us is petitioner’s pro se motion for rule on clerk

seeking to file the record belatedly.

       We deny the petition because it is clear from the partial record tendered by petitioner that

he could not prevail on appeal if the motion were granted. An appeal from an order that denied

a petition for postconviction relief will not be permitted to go forward where it is clear that the

       1
        The record was tendered 236 days after the notice of appeal was filed.
                                         Cite as 2013 Ark.

appellant could not prevail. Glaze v. State, 

 (per curiam); Paige v. State, 

 (per curiam); Crain v. State, 

 (per curiam); Hatton v. State, 

 (per

curiam).

       Criminal Procedure Rule 37.1 requires that a petition filed under the Rule be verified.

Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1(c)–(d); see Riley v. State, 

 (per curiam) (citing Nelson v. State,

, 

 (2005) (per curiam)). Rule 37.1(c) provides a form of affidavit

to be attached to the petition. The verification requirement for a petition for postconviction

relief is of substantive importance to prevent perjury. Paige, 

; Riley, 

.

For that purpose to be served, the petitioner must sign the petition and execute the requisite

affidavit or verification. Riley, 

 (citing Boyle v. State, 

, 

(2005) (per curiam)).

       Petitioner’s petition for postconviction relief was not accompanied by the required

verification; thus, petitioner did not meet the requirements of Rule 37.1(c). Rule 37.1(d) requires

that the circuit clerk reject an unverified petition and that the circuit court or any appellate court

must dismiss a petition that fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 37.1(c). Paige, 

.

       Motion denied.

       Jamie Lynn Fowler, pro se petitioner.

       No response.




                                                  2