¶1 AND NOW, this 26th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did not the Superior Court err in finding the evidence sufficient to convict Petitioner for violating 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 6105 because he was specifically convicted under § 6105(c), and the Commonwealth failed to prove that he was a "fugitive from justice" as that term is meant in § 6105(c)?