Public-domain · open source

203 U.S. 585

Docket No. 60.

Stuart v. Hauser

Supreme Court of the United States

Argued November 15, 1906.

Decided December 3, 1906.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1906-12-03

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1909

1 counsel of record

Relies on Gableman v. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co. · City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Water-Works Co Conery · Thomas Swafford v. W a Templeton S H

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1906-12-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. George B. Colby and Mr. Charles W. Dayton for plaintiff in error. Mr. S. M. Stockslager and Mr. W. E. Borah for defendants in error.

¶2In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho.

¶3Per Curiam.

¶4Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Swafford v. Templeton, 185 U. S. 487; Butler v. Gage, 138 U. S. 52; Home for Incurables v. City of New York, 187 U. S. 155; Erie Railroad Company v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148; Ansbro v. United States, 159 U. S. 695; Cornell v. Creen, 163 U. S. 75; Bausman v. Dixon, 173 U. S. 113; Gableman v. Peoria &c. Railway Company, 179 U. S. 335; City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Company, 142 U. S. 79; Beals v. Cone, 188 U. S. 184; Speed v. McCarthy, 181 U. S. 269. Case below, 9 Idaho, 53.