Chapman v. Chapman

Supreme Court of the United States

Motion to dismiss submitted De*587cember 10, 1906.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1906-12-17

1 counsel of record

Relies on Seward Haseltine v. Central National Bank · Schlosser v. Hemphill

Decided 1906-12-17

¶1 *586In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska.

¶2Mr. William E. Gantt and Mr. Herbert L. Baker for plaintiff in error. Mr. E. F. Colladay, Mr. J. W. Woodrough and Mr. W. F. Gurley for defendant in error.

¶3Per Curiam.

¶4Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Haseltine v. Central Bank, 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173.