Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

207 A.3d 289

Commonwealth v. Small, E.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 2019

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2019-04-23

Relies on Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Burton, S.

Decided 2019-04-23

PER CURIAM .

¶1 AND NOW, this 23 rd day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Where Small did not receive notice of his co-defendant Larry Bell's 1993 PCRA hearing, and where Small has been continuously incarcerated, with only limited assistance of counsel on unrelated claims since that time, was Bell's PCRA testimony "unknown" to Small under Commonwealth v. Burton [, 638 Pa. 687 , 158 A.3d 618 (2017)]?
(2) Has Small otherwise satisfied the requirements for an exception to the PCRA time-bar under [42 Pa.C.S.] § 9545(b)(1)(ii) based on his co-defendant Bell's PCRA testimony, such that the PCRA court's grant of a new trial should be reinstated?
/207/a3d/289 · .json · Public domain