OpenJurist › Volume 239 › U.S. › Page 634 239 U.S. 634
Stead v. Curtis Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1915-12-20
<p>Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.</p>
2 counsel of record
Relies on Farrell v. O'Brien · Hull v. Burr · Arbuckle v. Blackburn
Good law ✅ — No negative treatment on record how we know
Decided 1915-12-20
How this case has been cited Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 1956
5 state decisions
3 0 1915 1920 1930 1940 1950 decided Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
¶2 Mr. Horace W. Philbrook for the appellants.
¶3 Mr. Garret W. Mc-Enerney, Mr. John S. Partridge and Mr. C. H. Lovell for the appellees.
¶4 Per Curiam.
¶5 Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Cosmopolitan Mining Co. v. Walsh , 193 U. S. 460 ; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89 ; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 235 -236; (2) Arbuckle v. Blackburn , 191 U. S. 405 ; Hull v. Burr , 234 U. S. 712, 720 ; Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Publishing Co., 237 U. S. 618, 621 .
Download
Copy
Embed on your site
iframe Markdown Preview card Button Hover to preview · click to copy the code
Counsel Mr. Horace W. Philbrook for the appellants. Mr. Garret W. Mc-Enerney, Mr. John S. Partridge and Mr. C. H. Lovell for the appellees. In the law dictionary Defined terms used in this case
/239/us/634 · .json · Public domain