154 U.S. 650 - Lammers v. Nissen — 154 U.S. 650

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1995

1 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA.

¶2When the District Court in a State has given a judgment which involves the finding of a fact in dispute, and that judgment is affirmed by the Supreme Court of the State, this court will not disturb the judgment of the latter unless the error be clear.

¶3Mr. M. II. Carpenter, Mr. S. W. Packard, Mr. James Coleman, and Mr. Q. C. Moody for plaintiff in error.

¶4Mr. B. F. Grafton and Mr. II. E. Paine for defendants in error.

¶5Mr. Chief Justice Waite

¶6delivered the opinion of the court.

¶7The only question in this case is whether as a matter of fact, when Lammers, the plaintiff in error, purchased from the United States, lot 1, sec. 12, T. 33, R. 1, Dakota City land district, there was in front and outside of the meandered line of the lot any land that could be cultivated, or that bore trees of value, or grass sufficient for grazing purposes. There is no dispute between the parties as to the law. The District Court of Cedar County found there was such land and this finding has been affirmed by the Supreme Court of Nebraska on appeal. Under such circumstances we ought not to disturb the judgment of the state court unless the error is clear. No less stringent rule should be applied in cases of this kind than that which formerly governed in admiralty appeals, when two courts had found in the same way, on a question of fact.

¶8After a careful examination of the evidence, we are satisfied with the result reached by the court below, and the judgment is, consequently, Affirmed.