Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

254 U.S. 608

Docket No. 192.

Conklin v. Conklin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 18, 1920

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1920-10-18

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1922

Relies on Farrell v. O'Brien · Goodrich v. Ferris · Sugarman v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1920-10-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia. Argued October 12, 1920. Decided October 18, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184. Mary L. Greer Conklin pro se. Mr. William M. Howard, with whom Mr. Jos. B. Gumming, Mr. J. C. C. Black, Mr. William H. Barrett, Mr. Bryan Cumming, Mr. C. Henry Cohen and Mr. W. G. Brantley were on the brief, for appellees.

/254/us/608 · .json · Public domain