¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia. Argued October 12, 1920. Decided October 18, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184. Mary L. Greer Conklin pro se. Mr. William M. Howard, with whom Mr. Jos. B. Gumming, Mr. J. C. C. Black, Mr. William H. Barrett, Mr. Bryan Cumming, Mr. C. Henry Cohen and Mr. W. G. Brantley were on the brief, for appellees.
254 U.S. 608
Docket No. 192.
Conklin v. Conklin
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 18, 1920
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1920-10-18
Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1922
Relies on Farrell v. O'Brien · Goodrich v. Ferris · Sugarman v. United States
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1920-10-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →