9 U.S. 289
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 1, 1809
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1809-02
<p>if the counsel a“ tfe^oause.Hi called, the wrr ot error will b. dismissed,</p>
Relies on Rush v. Parker
Cited in Case Law’s definition of “Foreign bankrupt law (no extraterritorial legal transfer)” · Case Law’s definition of “Lex loci contractus (and priority of the United States)”
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · 7–0 · Decided 1809-02
Cited by 71 later decisions (20 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2005 · most notably United States v. Pink (1942), United States v. Belmont (1937)
14 federal appellate · 6 district · 17 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1if the counsel a“ tfe^oause.Hi called, the wrr ot error will b. dismissed,
¶2NO appearance having been entered on the docket for .either party in this cause, no counsel appearing, the court ordered both parties tó be called, and neither of them appearing, the court ordered the writ r ■ , „ i■.r • S of error to be dismissed.
¶3The same order was made in the cases of Banks v. Bastrop, Tompkins v. Tompkins, and Buchannan v. Yeates.