309 U.S. 620
Docket No. 622.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 29, 1940.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1940-01-29
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1957
1 federal appellate ·
1 counsel of record
Relies on Village of Euclid Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co · Thomas Cusack Company v. City of Chicago · People of the State of New York Ex Rel Albert Hatch v. Edward Reardon a
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1940-01-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶2The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Euclid v. Ambler, 272 U. S. 365; Cusack Co. v. Chicago, 242 U. S. 526; (2) Hatch v. Reardon, 204 U. S. 152, 160-161; Standard Food Co. v. Wright, 225 U. S. 540, 550; Warehouse Co. v. Tobacco Growers, 276 *621U. S. 71, 88; (3) Caperton v. Boywer, 14 Wall. 216, 236-237; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 442-443.
¶3Mr. Edward N. Barnard for appellants.