Volume 332 — United States Reports

This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 332 of the United States Reports:

United States v. California, 332 U.S. 19 (1947), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and the Federal Government, rather than the State, has paramount rights in and power over that belt, an incident to which is full dominion over the resources of the soil under that water area, including oil. The case was better known in its time as The Tidelands Case, although this was a misnomer because it did not involve tidelands.

Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 (1947), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the incorporation of the Fifth Amendment of the Bill of Rights. Its decision is part of a long line of cases that eventually led to the Selective Incorporation Doctrine.

Held: however, that such evidence was inadmissible, that the classification was final and not open to attack in the criminal trial. On February 4, 1946, we decided Estep v. United States and Smith v. United States, 327 U. S. 114 .

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194 (1947), is a United States Supreme Court case. It is often referred to as Chenery II.

Held: was unconstitutional delegation of the congressional function. It relied on Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U. S. 388 , and Schechter Corp. v. United States, 295 U. S. 495 . Both cited cases dealt with delegation of a power to make federal crimes of acts that never had been such before and to devise novel rules of law in a field in which there had been no settled law or custom.

Held: in cases in which it was thought a more impartial jury would thus be had. It lost its usefulness because of the ease with which a change of venue might be obtained.

International Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U.S. 392 (1947), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the Sherman Act prohibits as per se violations all tying arrangements in which a product for which a seller has a legal monopoly, such as a patent, requires purchasers to buy as well a product for which the seller has no legal monopoly.

Cox v. United States, 332 U.S. 442 (1947), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States found that courts have only limited scope of review over a Selective Service Board's classification of a Jehovah's Witness as a conscientious objector rather than a minister.

Held: used, administered, liquidated, sold, or otherwise dealt with in the interest of and for the benefit of the United States, and such designated agency or person may perform any and all acts incident to the accomplishment or furtherance of these purposes; . . . .” 3 Art. I, §8, cl. 11. 4 Compare with the statement below: “The power of Congress to seize and confiscate enemy property rests upon Art. 1, § 8, Clause 11 of…

Held: used, administered, liquidated, sold, or otherwise dealt with in the interest of and for the benefit of the United States . . . .” 5 See note 2, supra. 6 As to the powers of the custodian or other agency designated by the President over the property, see § 5 (b) (1), supra note 4, and § 12. 7 See note 2, supra. 8 See note 2, supra. 9 See 60 Stat. 50 , adding § 32 (a) (2) (E) to the Act.

Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 332 U.S. 631 (1948), is a per curiam United States Supreme Court decision involving racial segregation toward African Americans by the University of Oklahoma and the application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Oyama v. State of California, 332 U.S. 633 (1948) was a United States Supreme Court decision that ruled that specific provisions of the 1913 and 1920 California Alien Land Laws abridged the rights and privileges guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to Fred Oyama, a U.S. citizen in whose name his father, a Japanese citizen, had purchased land. In doing so, however, the court did not overturn the California Alien Land Laws as unconstitutional.